~5m1:50:04The New World Order in Iran, Ukraine and Palestine – Robert Pape & Aaron Maté
Sep 13, 2026
Read: ~5m · You save: 105 min
The New World Order in Iran, Ukraine and Palestine
Explore the shifting global order, the Ukraine and Iran wars' impact, and the future of international relations with experts Robert Pape & Aaron Maté.
The international geopolitical landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, marked by the declining influence of the United States and the emergence of new power dynamics. This shift is evident in ongoing conflicts in Iran, Ukraine, and Palestine, where established norms of warfare and diplomacy are being challenged. Experts Robert Pape and Aaron Maté discussed these complex issues, highlighting the interconnectedness of global events and the potential for a new world order.
The Diminishing Hegemony of the United States
Robert Pape, a professor at the University of Chicago specializing in political violence, argued that the United States' unipolar moment, established after the Cold War, is ending. He pointed to the 1991 Gulf War as a demonstration of American "escalation dominance," where a swift military victory with minimal US casualties solidified its global preeminence. However, Pape contends that the current conflicts, particularly the war involving Iran, have taught the world that the U.S. can be defeated, fundamentally altering regional and global power balances.
This perceived decline in American capability has significant implications. Frontline Gulf States, South Korea, and Japan may no longer be able to rely on U.S. protection. Europe, in particular, is increasingly on its own, facing the challenge of self-reliance rather than depending on American will or capability.
Aaron Maté, a journalist and author, echoed this sentiment, stating that Washington is "incapable and in fact hostile to diplomacy." He believes this refusal to accept globally recognized diplomatic solutions is a major driver of war and strife. Maté cited the denial of Palestinian self-determination and the failure to implement the Minsk Accords in Ukraine as prime examples of diplomatic avenues being ignored.
The Roots of Conflict: Iran, Ukraine, and Palestine
Iran and the Escalation Trap
Pape has been modeling the bombing of Iran for over two decades, consistently predicting that an attack on the Fordow facility would lead to a panic over dispersed nuclear material. This, he argues, would inevitably result in "regime change bombing," a strategy with a historically poor success rate. The core tension, according to Pape, is the choice between allowing Iran to become a regional hegemon or escalating to claw back influence, a dilemma that has significant collateral damage for Europe.
Ukraine: A Proxy War with Global Consequences
Maté described the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war fueled by a bipartisan war establishment in Washington that opposed the Minsk Accords. These accords, brokered by France and Germany, aimed to resolve the civil war in Ukraine by granting limited autonomy to the Donbas region. However, domestic extremists in Ukraine and their allies in Washington rejected this compromise, leading to continued conflict. Maté noted the recent overlap between the Ukraine and Iran conflicts, evidenced by Ukraine bombing an Iranian tanker, underscoring the dangers of festering global disputes.
Palestine: The Unresolved Core Issue
Both Pape and Maté emphasized the centrality of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Pape traced the rise of Hamas and subsequent violence back to 1982, when 1,500 Jewish settlers annually began taking territory from Palestinians. He asserted that as long as Israel is committed to settling Jews in Palestinian territory, peace through accords or negotiations is unattainable.
Maté took the historical analysis further, stating that early Zionists recognized that their movement was predicated on displacing Palestinians and seizing their land. This, he argued, led to the Nakba in 1947-1948, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were ethnically cleansed. Maté believes Israel's current actions in Gaza are a continuation of this goal, aiming for a "new Nakba." He pointed to the UN's recent report of an average of one child killed per day in Gaza as evidence of this ongoing objective.
The Changing Nature of Warfare
Pape highlighted the diffusion of the "second precision revolution," characterized by the proliferation of cheap, advanced drone technology. He noted that in Ukraine, donor-funded drone factories produced first-person view drones that proved highly effective against Russian massed forces. This concept has spread to groups like the Houthis in Yemen, who have used drones and missiles to disrupt Red Sea shipping, and is expected to be adopted by Hezbollah, posing a significant threat to Israel's economy. Pape predicts that this technological shift will dramatically alter global politics and diminish the dominance of established military powers.
Maté discussed the concept of proxy wars, referencing Oliver North's phrase "their blood, our bullets" to describe the U.S. use of Ukraine as a proxy against Russia. He argued that the absence of American casualties makes it easier to sustain such conflicts, leading to prolonged wars with devastating consequences for the proxy nations.
Europe's Role and the Path Forward
The experts discussed Europe's evolving role in a post-American world. Pape suggested that Europe must embrace its independence and rediscover its role as a peacemaker. He urged Europe to abandon policies that offer false hope to Ukraine and instead pursue stability, potentially through a revived Minsk Accords-like framework.
Maté advocated for a serious attempt at diplomacy, emphasizing the need to address Russia's perceived security concerns, including NATO expansion and the dismantling of arms control treaties. He proposed the Korean Peninsula as a model for achieving stability through an armistice and a line of contact, rather than a comprehensive peace settlement.
Both experts agreed on the importance of stability, particularly for Europe, to avoid the potential collapse of Russia and the ensuing security risks. They also touched upon the generational divide in Western public opinion regarding Israel, with younger generations increasingly critical of its actions.
The discussion concluded with a focus on the human cost of these conflicts, particularly for ordinary citizens and refugees, and the urgent need for stability to alleviate economic pressures and prevent further suffering.
Shifting Global Power and the Ukraine Conflict
Robert Pape discusses the strategic implications of Iran's perceived ability to challenge US dominance, leading to a reevaluation of global alliances and capabilities, particularly for Europe. Aaron Maté highlights Putin's miscalculation in Ukraine and the dangers of proxy wars, advocating for Europe to reclaim its role as a peacemaker.
- Iran's perceived ability to defeat the US fundamentally alters global power dynamics.
- Frontline Gulf States, South Korea, and Japan may no longer depend on US protection.
- Europe is increasingly on its own, questioning US capability rather than will.
- Putin miscalculated in Ukraine, expecting to be welcomed as a liberator.
- Proxy wars between nuclear powers are detrimental to global well-being.
- Europe has the potential to re-establish itself as a peacemaker.
The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Settlements
The discussion delves into the historical roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, attributing the rise of Hamas and subsequent intifadas to Israeli settlement expansion since 1982. The narrative emphasizes that continued settlement is a fundamental obstacle to peace, regardless of accords or negotiations.
- Starting in 1982, 1,500 Jewish settlers annually took territory from Palestinians.
- This expansion is identified as the cause for the rise of Hamas in 1987.
- It also led to the first intifada and subsequent suicide attacks.
- As long as Israel pursues settlement in Palestinian territory, peace is unattainable through accords or negotiations.
- The policy of settling Jews in Palestinian territory is a core reason for the lack of peace.
Introductions and Expert Backgrounds
Aaron Maté introduces himself as a journalist and author focusing on US foreign policy and the Ukraine war. Robert Pape, a professor at the University of Chicago, details his extensive research on war, political violence, conventional targeting strategy, and air campaigns, mentioning his upcoming book on internal US divisions.
- Aaron Maté is a journalist and author of a forthcoming book on the Ukraine war titled 'Their Blood Our Bullets'.
- Maté covers geopolitics, with a focus on US foreign policy.
- Robert Pape is a professor at the University of Chicago specializing in war and political violence.
- Pape has over 30 years of experience studying these topics.
- He taught conventional targeting strategy for the US Air Force.
- Pape authored 'Bombing to Win', covering air campaigns from WWI to the present.
- His new book, 'Our Own Worst Enemies', examines factors dividing America.
Modeling the Bombing of Iran and Escalation Traps
Robert Pape explains his 20-year modeling of bombing Iran, predicting that attacking Fordo would lead to panic over dispersed nuclear material and subsequent regime-change bombing, despite historical failures of such strategies. He frames the current situation as an 'escalation trap' where Iran's growing regional power presents a choice between accepting its hegemony or escalating conflict.
- Pape has modeled bombing Iran for over 20 years, starting in 2005.
- Modeling consistently shows that bombing Fordo would lead to US panic over dispersed nuclear material within weeks.
- Bombing Fordo would disable it as an enrichment facility but not reveal the material's location.
- This would likely lead to regime-change bombing of Iran within a year or two.
- Historically, bombing regimes has not been effective.
- The core tension is between accepting Iran as a regional hegemon or escalating to regain influence.
- Europe is collateral damage, paying the highest price without consultation.
Diplomacy, Palestinian Self-Determination, and Middle East Conflict
Aaron Maté argues that US hostility to diplomacy and refusal to accept globally accepted solutions drive conflict, particularly in the Middle East where denial of Palestinian self-determination is the core issue. He points to the US and Israel's opposition to a two-state solution, contrasting it with broader international support, and links this to the October 7th events and a 'regime change war' against Iran.
- Washington is characterized as incapable of and hostile to diplomacy.
- The primary driver of conflict is the refusal to accept globally accepted diplomatic solutions.
- In the Middle East, the main problem is the denial of Palestinian self-determination.
- A compromise of 22% of historic homeland for Palestinians is supported globally, including by Hamas, PA, and Iran.
- Only the US and Israel oppose this two-state solution.
- This opposition is seen as a cause of the October 7th events and a 'regime change war' against Iran.
- Iran is targeted not for its own threat, but for supporting resistance groups.
The Ukraine Conflict and Diplomatic Failures
Maté extends his analysis to the Ukraine conflict, citing the Minsk Accords as a globally supported diplomatic solution for the Donbas civil war, opposed only by Ukrainian extremists and their US allies. He notes the overlap with the Iran conflict, highlighting the dangers of festering conflicts and the US refusal to accept global consensus.
- The Minsk Accords, brokered by France and Germany, called for limited autonomy for Donbas.
- The Accords were supported by most of Europe and endorsed by the UN Security Council.
- Opposition came from domestic extremists in Ukraine (e.g., Azov battalion) and allies in Washington.
- These groups prevented Ukraine from accepting the compromise brokered by Angela Merkel.
- The Ukraine and Iran conflicts are showing signs of overlap, increasing dangers.
- The US refusal to accept global consensus on compromises fuels conflict.
Ending Wars: Balance of Power and Diplomatic Stalemate
Katina from Slovakia asks how to end the current wars and why Israel is escalating its actions in Palestine now. Pape responds that wars end with agreement on the balance of power, noting the shifting balance between the US, Israel, and Iran. Maté discusses the terms of potential peace deals, highlighting Iran's adherence to the JCPOA and Trump's demand for surrender, and the missed opportunities for peace in Ukraine.
- Wars end when main combatants agree on the balance of power.
- The balance of power in the Middle East has shifted, with Iran rising and the US and Israel potentially contained.
- The US wants to return to a pre-war balance, while Iran seeks to establish a new one.
- Iran's terms for peace involve respecting the JCPOA; Trump's terms involve surrender.
- The US strategy involves suffocating Iran with sanctions.
- Iran attempts to pressure Trump by blocking Strait of Hormuz traffic.
- The Ukraine war could have ended years ago with the Istanbul agreement, but was undermined by external influence.
Settlements as the Root Cause of Palestinian Violence
Robert Pape explains his research on suicide terrorism, linking the rise of Hamas and subsequent violence directly to Israeli settlement expansion in Palestinian territories starting in 1982. He argues that continued settlement is the root cause and that peace is impossible without reversing this policy.
- Pape's research on suicide attacks since 1982 identifies Jewish settlements as a primary cause.
- From 1982, 1,500 Jewish settlers annually took territory from Palestinians.
- This policy continued through the 1980s, 1990s, and beyond, including during the Oslo Accords.
- This expansion is directly linked to the rise of Hamas in 1987, the first intifada, and suicide attacks.
- Peace is impossible as long as Israel is committed to settling Jews in Palestinian territory.
- Palestinians will not accept their territory being taken and governed by an 'alien force'.
- Reversing settlements, not just containing or stopping them, is necessary for change.
The Nakba, Ethnic Cleansing, and the Goal of a 'New Nakba'
Aaron Maté traces Zionism's origins to the displacement and land theft of Palestinians, leading to the Nakba. He argues Israel seeks a 'new Nakba' and continues to violate ceasefires, citing the killing of children in Gaza. He criticizes even Obama's call for a settlement freeze as insufficient, emphasizing the need to dismantle settlements.
- Early Zionists recognized Zionism was predicated on displacing Palestinians and stealing land.
- This led to the Nakba in 1947-1948, with hundreds of thousands ethnically cleansed.
- Israel aims for a 'new Nakba', using October 7th as an opportunity.
- Gaza was destroyed to facilitate Palestinian expulsion, though global constraints prevented full ethnic cleansing.
- Israel continues to flout ceasefire obligations.
- An average of one child per day is killed in Gaza, continuing the goal of a new Nakba.
- Even a settlement freeze, as proposed by Obama, is insufficient; dismantling is needed.
Decline of US Hegemony and the Iran War's Global Impact
A question is raised about the decline of US hegemonic power and its effects on the Middle East, mentioning a potential shift towards regional powers like China and the SCO. Pape responds by contrasting the 1991 Gulf War's demonstration of US escalation dominance with the current situation where Iran has shown America can be beaten, leading to a fundamental change in global politics and potentially reversing globalization.
- The question posits a decline in US hegemonic power and a rise in regional powers like China.
- The SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) is mentioned as a force for regional self-determination.
- The 1991 Gulf War demonstrated US 'escalation dominance'.
- The current situation, particularly with Iran, shows America can be beaten.
- This shatters the illusion of US escalation dominance.
- This fundamentally changes Middle East politics and global alliances.
- Countries like South Korea and Japan may no longer depend on the US.
- Europe is on its own, facing challenges to US capability.
- The decline of US preeminence could reverse globalization.
US Financial Power, Syria, and the Ukraine War's Strategic Outcomes
Maté argues that the US, despite military setbacks, retains control through the financial system (SWIFT, sanctions) and has achieved regime change in Syria. He notes that while Iran was a setback, US financial leverage and sanctions remain potent. He also discusses the Ukraine war, where Russia gained territory but was 'decimated,' and the destruction of Nord Stream pipelines benefiting the US by increasing European dependence.
- The US military has suffered losses in the Middle East, with bases potentially inoperable.
- The US controls the global financial system via SWIFT and sanctions, impacting economies like Venezuela.
- Regime change was achieved in Syria, replacing an Iranian ally with a former al-Qaeda leader.
- Despite setbacks in Iran, US financial leverage and sanctions are significant.
- In Ukraine, Russia gained territory but was 'decimated' as intended by the proxy war.
- The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines benefits the US by increasing European dependence on it.
- US officials view Nord Stream's destruction as a strategic opportunity.
US Foreign Policy Failures and the Rise of New Powers
A participant questions the US expectation of Iran's surrender and the shift from diplomacy to military power post-Gulf War. Pape agrees, noting the US has unwillingly played Iran's game by creating failed states and empowering regional actors. He highlights the diffusion of precision technology (drones) and the world's collective 'enough' regarding US dominance.
- The US is no longer the dominant power and cannot prevent Iran from becoming a regional hegemon.
- Post-Gulf War, the US replaced diplomacy with military power.
- US foreign policy has created failed states in Iraq, Syria, and Libya.
- This has indirectly empowered Iran.
- The diffusion of cheap, precision technology (drones) is changing warfare.
- The world is collectively saying 'enough' to US dominance.
Post-Cold War US Expansion, Globalization Reversal, and Drone Technology
Pape elaborates on the post-Cold War US expansion into the Middle East, attributing it to hubris and excessive power, leading to increased global trade facilitated by US security guarantees. He warns this is reversing, potentially leading to limits on globalization. He also discusses the 'second precision revolution' (cheap drones) and the diffusion of this technology globally.
- Post-Cold War, the US expanded influence into the Middle East.
- This expansion, coupled with NATO growth, is seen as hubris from excessive power.
- US security guarantees facilitated globalization (increased trade).
- This is now reversing, potentially leading to limits or reversal of globalization.
- The 'second precision revolution' involves cheap, precise drone technology.
- This technology is diffusing globally, from Ukraine to the Houthis and Iran.
- This diffusion will fundamentally change global politics.
US Financial Dominance and Strategic Gains Despite Setbacks
Maté counters that the US still holds significant financial power and has achieved regime change in Syria. He argues that despite military setbacks, US financial leverage and sanctions remain potent. He also discusses the Ukraine war, where Russia gained territory but was 'decimated,' and the destruction of Nord Stream pipelines benefiting the US by increasing European dependence.
- The US military has suffered losses in the Middle East, with bases potentially inoperable.
- The US controls the global financial system via SWIFT and sanctions, impacting economies like Venezuela.
- Regime change was achieved in Syria, replacing an Iranian ally with a former al-Qaeda leader.
- Despite setbacks in Iran, US financial leverage and sanctions are significant.
- In Ukraine, Russia gained territory but was 'decimated' as intended by the proxy war.
- The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines benefits the US by increasing European dependence on it.
- US officials view Nord Stream's destruction as a strategic opportunity.
Sanctions on Israel, Generational Divides, and Ethnic Cleansing
A participant notes the UK's sanctions on Israel, un-condemned by Washington, suggesting a shift in public opinion and upcoming elections. Maté agrees, highlighting a generational divide in US views on Israel and the impact of censorship on reporting. Pape emphasizes targeting sanctions on ethnic cleansing and settlements, drawing parallels to the South Africa model.
- The UK imposed sanctions on Israel, which Washington did not condemn.
- This is seen as a reflection of shifting public opinion and upcoming elections.
- There is a stark generational divide in US views on Israel, with younger generations less supportive.
- Censorship regimes in the West are creating backlash, particularly among young people.
- Sanctions should be specifically targeted at ethnic cleansing and settlements in Palestinian territories.
- The South Africa model of sanctions is presented as a potential success.
- A generational divide exists regarding support for Israel, influenced by historical context (Holocaust) vs. current events.
The Second Precision Revolution and the Changing Face of Warfare
Pape discusses the 'second precision revolution' and the spread of drone technology, citing Ukraine, Houthis, and Iran. He predicts Hezbollah will use similar technology against Israel, impacting its economy. He argues this diffusion of cheap, effective technology fundamentally changes warfare and signals the end of US hegemony.
- The 'second precision revolution' involves the spread of cheap, effective drone technology.
- This technology diffused from Ukraine to the Houthis and Iran.
- Hezbollah is expected to use similar drone technology against Israel, impacting its seaborn trade.
- This technology is difficult to counter, requiring extensive territorial control.
- The diffusion of this technology fundamentally changes global politics and warfare.
- This signals the end of US hegemony and the era of American military preeminence.
AI in Warfare, Proxy Wars, and the Human Cost
Maté discusses the use of AI in warfare, citing Gaza as a 'military laboratory' and the targeting of a school in Iran. He highlights the proxy war model in Ukraine, where 'their blood, our bullets' signifies major powers waging war without direct human cost, making prolonged conflict easier.
- Gaza is described as a 'military laboratory' for surveillance and biometrics.
- AI was allegedly used in targeting a school in Iran, killing over 100 children.
- Dismantling oversight for civilian protection contributed to such incidents.
- The Ukraine war exemplifies the 'proxy war' model: 'their blood, our bullets'.
- This model allows major powers to wage war without direct human cost to their own citizens.
- The absence of returning body bags makes prolonged conflict more politically feasible.
China's Industrial Modernization and US Lag
A participant asks about the economic basis for the West to win future wars against larger populations in Asia. Pape responds by detailing his observations of China's advanced industries, emphasizing their integrated approach with universities and city-wide development, suggesting the US is significantly behind. He argues this modernization is key to power and wealth.
- The question concerns the West's economic capacity to win future wars against larger Asian populations.
- Pape toured China's advanced industries, finding them far beyond media portrayal.
- China's progress is characterized by integrated development of cities, universities, and industries.
- This contrasts with a US approach focused on individual tech companies.
- Pape believes the US is significantly behind China in modernization and industrial development.
- This modernization is crucial for future economic power and global influence.
Europe's Role in a Post-American World and Peace Initiatives
Maté advises Europe to prepare for a 'post-America' world, suggesting NATO's operational reality is dead. He advocates for Europe to rediscover its peacemaker role, potentially reviving concepts like the Minsk Accords for Ukraine, and imposing an arms embargo on Israel to isolate US support.
- Europe must prepare for a 'post-America' world.
- The operational reality of NATO is considered dead, despite its continued existence.
- Article 5's reliance on US command is no longer tenable for European nations.
- Europe should rediscover its role as a peacemaker.
- For Ukraine, this could involve reviving concepts similar to the Minsk Accords.
- An arms embargo on Israel would significantly impact US support and isolate it.
Stability as Europe's Priority: The Korean Model for Ukraine
Pape suggests Europe's interest lies in stability, not necessarily a Ukrainian victory, proposing a Korean Peninsula-like model with a ceasefire along the line of contact and restraint on attacks. He warns against a Russian meltdown, citing the danger of loose nuclear weapons, and emphasizes stability over regime change.
- Europe's primary interest is stability, not necessarily a decisive Ukrainian victory.
- A Korean Peninsula model (armistice, DMZ) could be applied to Ukraine.
- This involves a ceasefire along the current line of contact.
- Ukraine must agree to restraint, not attacking behind the line of contact.
- A Russian meltdown poses a severe risk due to thousands of nuclear weapons.
- Stability is prioritized over regime change in Russia.
- The US approach has sometimes favored regime change over stability.
Diplomacy, Russian Security Concerns, and Stability Agreements
Maté proposes a serious diplomatic attempt for Ukraine, criticizing the sabotage of Minsk and Istanbul talks. He argues Russia's perceived security threats (NATO expansion, arms control treaty withdrawals) should be addressed. He suggests a Korean-style stability agreement, where Ukraine refrains from provoking Russia, could be a path forward.
- A serious diplomatic attempt for Ukraine is proposed.
- Past diplomatic efforts like Minsk Accords and Istanbul talks were undermined.
- Russia's perceived security threats, including NATO expansion and arms control withdrawals, should be addressed.
- A stability agreement, similar to the Korean Peninsula model, is suggested.
- This would involve Ukraine refraining from provoking Russia.
- The Biden administration's approach did not prioritize stability.
- Trump's administration further removed restraints on Ukraine.
Stability in Russia: Preventing a Nuclear Catastrophe
Pape agrees on the need for stability and warns against a Russian meltdown, highlighting the danger of loose nuclear weapons. He reiterates that the focus should be on stability, not necessarily Ukrainian victory or Russian defeat, emphasizing Europe's strong interest in this outcome.
- Stability is paramount for Europe.
- A meltdown of Russia poses extreme risks due to nuclear weapons.
- The focus should be on achieving stability, not necessarily a clear victory for either side.
- Europe has a vital interest in preventing instability emanating from Russia.
- The goal is to avoid a scenario similar to the 'loose nukes' problem of the 1990s.
US Policy Incoherence: Ukraine Strikes and Energy Prices
Maté shares an anecdote about the Biden administration authorizing Ukraine to strike into Russia, escalating the conflict before Trump's term. He criticizes the incoherence of US policy, where Ukraine's strikes on Russian energy infrastructure, authorized by the Trump administration's CIA, are later blamed for high energy prices.
- The Biden administration authorized Ukraine to strike into Russia.
- This authorization was ramped up after the election loss, anticipating Trump would contain escalation.
- The Trump administration's CIA authorized Ukraine to target Russian energy infrastructure.
- This led to visuals of destruction and power outages in Crimea.
- The Trump administration later blamed Ukraine for high energy prices, despite authorizing the strikes.
- This highlights the incoherence and self-defeating nature of US policy.
Long-Term Forecasts vs. Practical Policy Horizons
A participant suggests a cynical, yet possible, future where Ukraine's regime facilitates Eurasian trade, degrading Britain and North America. Pape acknowledges this possibility but emphasizes the difficulty of long-term forecasting, preferring a 1-5 year horizon for policy development, citing his accurate predictions based on this approach.
- A cynical future is proposed: Ukraine facilitating Eurasian trade, diminishing Western powers.
- This scenario involves a strong Eurasian economic engine.
- Pape acknowledges the possibility but stresses the difficulty of long-term forecasting (10-20 years).
- He prefers a 1-5 year horizon for developing predictable policies.
- His accurate predictions are attributed to focusing on a manageable time horizon.
- Decision-makers operate within shorter decision cycles, making long-term forecasts less actionable.
Applying the Korean Model to Ukraine: Ceasefire and Territorial Realities
A question arises about applying the Korean Peninsula model to Ukraine, given Russia's rejection of current lines. Pape suggests ending the war at the line of contact, similar to the Korean War's armistice, and imposing restraint on Ukrainian attacks. Maté believes the war will end with Russia controlling at least the Donbas.
- The Korean War ended via armistice along the line of contact, not a negotiated peace.
- Applying this to Ukraine means a ceasefire at the current contact line.
- Restraint on Ukrainian attacks behind the line of contact would be necessary.
- This avoids complex, protracted negotiations.
- Maté predicts the war will end with Russia controlling at least the Donbas.
- Russia is unlikely to relinquish its claims to the Donbas.
Sanctions on Israel: Generational Divides and Targeted Policies
A participant asks about European eagerness for sanctions on Israel and the perceived fear governments have of Israel's leverage. Pape attributes hesitation to a generational divide in the US, with older generations (Holocaust-influenced) being pro-Israel and younger generations less so. He reiterates that sanctions should target ethnic cleansing and settlements.
- Europeans are eager for sanctions on Israel, but governments hesitate.
- Hesitation may stem from fear of Israeli leverage or bilateral interests.
- A generational divide exists in US public opinion on Israel.
- Older Americans (over 45) are more pro-Israel due to Holocaust awareness (Schindler's List generation).
- Younger Americans have less exposure to this context and see current Israeli actions.
- Sanctions should be specifically tied to ethnic cleansing and settlements in Palestinian territories.
- This targeted approach could align with the South Africa model and gain broader support.
Generational Divides, Censorship, and the Human Cost of Conflict
Maté agrees on the generational divide and the psychological aspects, noting the impact of censorship. He argues Israel has lost the younger generation permanently. A final participant expresses concern for refugees and the economic impact of inflation, hoping for stability.
- A stark generational divide exists regarding support for Israel.
- Censorship and crackdowns on pro-Palestine activism are creating backlash.
- Young people are increasingly critical of Israel's actions.
- Israel has likely lost the support of the younger generation permanently.
- Refugees (Russian and Ukrainian women and children) face hardship.
- Inflationary pressures impact ordinary Europeans and Americans.
- Stability is crucial to alleviate economic pressures and support refugees.
Economic Consequences for Ordinary People and Political Realities
Pape emphasizes the critical importance of understanding the economic consequences of the Iran and Ukraine wars for ordinary people, not just governments. He expresses deep concern about potential economic disasters due to financial fragility, impacting millions in the US and Europe. He notes that if the far-right is the only force addressing these issues and calling for diplomacy, 'we're in trouble.'
- The most important aspect of the wars is their impact on ordinary people.
- There are significant concerns about economic consequences in the next 6-12 months.
- Financial fragility, particularly concerning the US dollar and treasuries, could lead to disaster.
- Millions in the US and Europe could be affected.
- If the far-right is the only political force addressing inflation, refugees, and advocating diplomacy, it signals a serious problem.