~42m1:49:57President Zelenskyy: It's Time To Tell You The Truth About The War! They Found 500 Bodies!
Oct 22, 2026
Read: ~43m · You save: 67 min
Zelensky: It's Time to Tell the Truth About the War! We Found 500 Bodies
Zelensky recalls how the full-scale invasion began, why Bucha was the hardest day, and what he thinks of Trump and the prospects for negotiations.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the time has come to speak openly about the war. He links its beginning to the occupation of Crimea in 2014. According to him, Vladimir Putin assured European leaders that there would be no invasion, although he knew it was being prepared. Zelensky calls the discovery of the bodies of the dead in Bucha the hardest day of his presidency.
The Beginning of the War and Its Consequences in Ukraine
The war began on February 24, 2022. Zelensky stated that he had not expected a full-scale invasion. On the day the war began, he was with his family. He told his wife and children that the war had begun, said that he loved them, and promised to call.
Satellite images recorded a column 64 km long moving toward Kyiv. According to Zelensky, around 200,000 people were heading for the city. He claimed that such a force could not be held back. Missiles fell on the city continuously. Zelensky described these moments as absolutely terrifying. He was in a bunker set up directly in his office.
U.S. President Joe Biden called Zelensky and offered to help with evacuation. Zelensky replied that he needed ammunition, not transport. According to him, the enemy expected people to run, but he could not abandon his people.
Volunteers began enlisting in the army. According to Zelensky, the strength of the Ukrainian armed forces grew from 200,000 to 800,000 people. Every day, the Ukrainian army increased pressure on the enemy.
Bucha and the Assessment of the Grave Events
Zelensky named the day of the liberation of Bucha, where he personally traveled, as the hardest day of his presidency. He reported that bodies of the dead lay everywhere: children, adults, and elderly people. According to him, people were killed with particular cruelty. The victims had their hands tied, were tortured, and were then buried in pits.
Zelensky compared these events to the discovery of a mass grave in the U.S. or Britain, where 500 tortured people were found. He asked how such a thing could be forgiven. Responding to President Trump's proposal to find a compromise, he stated that one cannot simply forgive everything.
The President's Condition and the Question of Hope
Asked whether the path to the end of the war is realistic, Zelensky gave no direct answer. When asked about his own condition, he said it was hard. According to him, he experiences the war together with the country and its people. He links the question of whether tomorrow will come with his own belonging to the country: his family, relatives, and the state form an inseparable part of him.
Zelensky said he combines an understanding of the difficult reality with optimism. According to him, good prevails, and he believes in this.
He acknowledged that hope takes different forms. According to him, during war people can be broken by inner shock, especially when a loved one dies: a child, a spouse, or a mother. In his view, such losses are endured far more painfully than his own difficulties.
Deaths of Children and Destroyed Homes
Strike on a Children's Playground
A missile hit a children's playground. It was so fast that the siren did not help: only seconds passed between the warning and the impact. As a result, children were killed, including two children on the playground. Adults were also killed. Among them were two passersby who were walking by.
Residential buildings stand next to the playground. Some parents watched what was happening through their windows. According to Zelensky, after such a tragedy it is customary to bring flowers to the adults and toys to the children.
He was on site and said that his pain cannot be compared with the pain of the parents. By his estimate, his own pain amounts to no more than 10% of the pain of the parents of the victims. He called what happened appalling.
Children Under Constant Threat
The missile cut short the life of a child who had not yet seen anything. Many of the dead were children who had never lived in peacetime. Zelensky noted that his generation remembers life without sirens and shelling. For today's children, the alarm sounds every night. They go down into shelters and then come back up. Some of them do not come back alive.
Zelensky stressed that many children have never known peace.
Insomnia and Daily Work with Air Defense Forces
Zelensky stated that he does not sleep. He communicates daily with the operators and commanders of Ukraine's air defense system. Contact is maintained through text messages. Current needs and the redistribution of resources from other regions are discussed. According to him, this mode of work does not allow him to sleep.
In almost five years of war, eight hours of sleep have become something new for him. He emphasized that he is not complaining.
Awarding the Parents of the Fallen
According to Zelensky, the hardest part is presenting the awards. The title of Hero of Ukraine is considered the highest honor. He presents it to the parents of fallen servicemen, boys and girls. In such moments, by his account, he ceases to exist. He clarified that this is not pain but something terrible. He then began to describe what he sees when he looks at these people, but the thought remained unfinished.
Personal Choice and Responsibility of a Leader
Parents of Fallen Soldiers
Zelensky spoke about meetings with the families of fallen soldiers. According to him, many parents say little and look at their interlocutor tensely. Some of them ask only for a hug. He recalled a father to whom he had presented an award: a sturdy, strong man quietly asked whether he could hug him.
Zelensky noted that such people temporarily cease to be who they were, although strong people try to hold on. He acknowledges that he respects such moments, but they are hard to endure. In his words, he understands these parents. It is an immense and frightening pain, which he would not wish on anyone.
He emphasized that the parents had not lost a child on a playground. They had lost a soldier. They knew such a thing was possible, but knowing and losing, in his words, are completely different things.
When asked about the tears in his eyes, Zelensky replied that he is a human being and is not ashamed of it. He does not call himself the strongest person in the world. He strives to set an example, but, in his own assessment, he is far from perfect.
Relying on Family
Asked what helps him maintain his strength, Zelensky named his children. He believes he is obliged to set an example for them. He says that a person needs to be strong and brave, but should not hide pain. In his words, human nature makes people vulnerable, and their strength lies within that vulnerability as well. The children, he said, help him stay grounded. He wants them to be proud of him.
Childhood in a Scientist's Family
Zelensky was born in Kryvyi Rih. He belongs to a generation that has lived through two eras: he was born in the Soviet Union, when Ukraine was part of it, and grew up in independent Ukraine.
He says that his children are luckier, since they were born in an independent country without "shades of gray." In his words, they are patriots who love their country, Ukraine.
The family was academic but, according to Zelensky, not materially prosperous. Scientists in Soviet Ukraine, as a rule, earned little. He singles out his father, an honest man and professor. In his words, the education, upbringing, and love his parents gave him are what he is grateful for.
His mother, he said, was very beautiful and remains so.
Early Plans and the Move to Media
As a child, Zelensky changed his aspirations. For a time he wanted to become a diplomat, then a border guard. He graduated from the law faculty, but during his studies he realized that media interested him more. After graduating, he began working precisely in that field.
At the age of 17, he said, he became interested in comedy.
Zelensky's Comedy Career and the Series "Servant of the People"
Comedy Career and Transition to Media Business
Zelensky worked in comedy until the age of 26. He worked as a screenwriter and from time to time appeared in small roles. At 26 he founded his own company. In his words, working as a screenwriter gave him pleasure.
Dancing and Voicing Paddington
At 28, Zelensky won the Ukrainian version of the show "Dancing with the Stars." When the host asked whether he could dance, Zelensky replied that, in his opinion, he could. He added that he was not sure whether he could dance back then, but he can now.
Later he voiced the bear Paddington in a Ukrainian film. He said he loves this character and considers him important for people. In his assessment, the film is intended not only for children, but the image deeply affected him.
After being elected president, Zelensky received offers to voice the next installment of the Paddington film. The offers came even before the war began. Zelensky replied that he would like to agree but did not do so.
The Role of a Teacher in "Servant of the People"
Between the ages of 34 and 37, Zelensky appeared in several feature films. His best-known role is that of a history teacher in the satirical series "Servant of the People." The character accidentally becomes the country's president.
Zelensky stated that he did not expect to become president. The idea for the series emerged about 10–12 years before his election. He thought about it for a long time and believed that Ukraine was changing. In his view, at that moment the idea became relevant and was supposed to resonate with viewers. The essence of the idea was that a person from the people, with no political experience and no connections to the authorities, becomes president. Zelensky noted that this is exactly how things turned out.
The host summed up that the character played a president, and Zelensky realized that the idea of a party or president "Servant of the People" could turn out to be successful, given the situation in the country and the state of the government.
Political Satire and Russia's Betrayal After the Occupation of Crimea
The series Servant of the People was a great success, but it was not part of a carefully planned strategy. Other projects were developed in parallel. Political satire was already widely popular before the series aired, so politics was already a familiar field. The decision to try working in this direction was made gradually.
The occupation of Crimea and Donbas became a key turning point. According to Zelensky, these events changed the country and its people, who began to feel that something was wrong in the country. A full-scale war had not yet begun, but a sense of unease had already emerged.
At that time, his team was running business in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Offices operated there, and projects were produced. Zelensky stated that he did not want to completely shut down this activity. He also described a feeling of betrayal on Russia's part. According to him, this entire period changed him as well.
He denies that the release of the series and the creation of the party were part of a calculated plan. He acknowledges that other people may come to that conclusion and considers this normal. The coincidence, in his words, is explained by a combination of factors: the public mood, his inner state, determination, and the desire to act.
Historical Connection and Ukraine's Independence in 1991
The Beginning of the War
Zelensky links the start of the war to the occupation of Crimea in 2014. In his words, Ukraine, which gained independence in 1991, could not believe what was happening. He believes the war began precisely with the seizure of the peninsula.
The occupation developed slowly and on the surface did not look like a war. Armed men appeared on the peninsula, but Russia for a long time refused to acknowledge them as its servicemen. They were called "polite people" and "little green men," since their uniforms made it impossible to determine their affiliation. Zelensky calls this process creeping occupation.
He claims that Ukraine's main mistake was the absence of an order to defend the territory. Ukrainian authorities did not call for resistance to those who, armed, violated the border and gradually seized Crimea. In his view, if such an order had been given, the full-scale war in its current form would probably not have broken out. Today, assessing events, he believes the war began precisely then, and not in 2015 or in 2022.
Family History and World War II
Zelensky's paternal grandfather fought in World War II from beginning to end. There were several brothers in his family, and all of them were killed by the Nazis. On both sides of his family, Zelensky has few surviving relatives, since many of them were murdered by the fascists.
Accusations of Nazism
Zelensky calls Russia's claims that there are Nazis in Ukraine absurd. In his words, the Ukrainian people deeply understand what it means to live under a fascist regime, because during World War II Ukraine was occupied entirely.
He also claims that Ukraine, Belarus, and other lands fought against Nazi Germany. Germany lost a huge number of soldiers precisely on the territory of Belarus and Ukraine. Russia, in his words, was not occupied. Therefore, Zelensky considers Putin's statements about the "denazification" of Ukraine absurd and outrageous. Ukrainians, in his words, fought the fascists and liberated their land.
Historical Background for a Young Audience
When asked how to explain the background of the conflict to a sixteen-year-old teenager, Zelensky began his answer by asserting that there was an empire.
Crimea, the Collapse of the USSR, and Russia's Historical Claims
The Soviet Union included a large number of states that are independent today. According to the speaker, all empires are structured this way: they exist for some time and then fall apart. In his view, a detailed analysis of the historical context is not required to understand this pattern.
According to his claim, an empire can hold a vast territory and many people together only through autocracy, tyranny, feudalism, and slavery. Freedom is not needed for this. He directly states that empires do not rest on freedom.
He sees the cause of empires' collapse in people's desire for freedom. People compare their lives in an empire with life in other countries, including small ones. They see how societies develop there, how people live and move freely, and how they choose partners, hair color, music, and clothing. In his words, such a comparison pushes people to leave the empire.
Identity and Imperial Rhetoric of the Kremlin
Information Isolation in the Empire
Zelensky describes the Soviet "Iron Curtain" as a means of restricting citizens' access to information about life in the West, in Europe, the United States, Great Britain, and other countries of Asia. The empire, in his words, controls information completely. Inside it there is no internet, and television is under the control of the authorities and transmits only selected information. Citizens find themselves in an information vacuum. He compares them to fish in an aquarium. The large aquarium that was the Soviet Union remains an aquarium. North Korea, in his words, is a smaller aquarium.
The Collapse of the USSR and Ukraine's Independence
The Soviet Union collapsed, and the countries that had been part of it became independent and smaller in size. Ukraine is one of them. In Zelensky's view, the formation of identity presupposes one's own language, music, and clothing. He cites tourism and the diversity of cultures that, in his words, exists throughout the world. He explains the collapse of empires by the fact that they contain peoples striving for their own independence.
Nostalgia and Putin's Position
Nostalgia for the Soviet Union, in Zelensky's words, has persisted among people since its collapse. Putin, as President of Russia, set himself a goal that Zelensky characterizes as the return of the empire and the Soviet Union. Zelensky calls Putin a Soviet man. According to his claim, Putin was an intelligence officer and worked for the KGB in Germany. Zelensky quotes Putin's words that the greatest catastrophe of the 20th century was the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Geopolitical Rivalry with the United States
Zelensky believes that Putin places responsibility for the collapse of the USSR on the United States. He describes relations between the USSR and the US as a geopolitical rivalry. Both states were allies during the Second World War. After it, a Cold War and confrontation began between them. In Zelensky's view, Putin's motivation is simple: he seeks to restore the Soviet Union.
Ukraine as the Center of Claims
Zelensky asserts that the Soviet Union above all means Ukraine. He calls Ukraine "country number two."
Denial of Ukrainian Statehood and the Second World War
Historical Connection and Ukraine's Independence in 1991
Zelensky says that in the Soviet Union Ukraine was called the forge of talents. According to him, Ukraine had many scientists, engineers, universities, and a large intelligentsia. Natives of Ukraine headed various institutions and ministries of the USSR. Ukraine was considered the intellectual part of the Soviet Union. The largest missile industry was concentrated on its territory. Many other products were also manufactured here, including nuclear weapons, which Ukraine handed over.
In his view, the problem for Russia was the following. If Ukraine becomes part of Europe, the collapse of Russia is inevitable. The country includes many peoples, religions, and nations, which would split into separate states.
Putin, according to Zelensky, decided to restore the empire. He decided to start with Chechnya. The Russian army waged war there and occupied the republic, which is now part of Russia. Chechnya was completely destroyed, no buildings remained, and an enormous number of people died. The commanders who fought in Chechnya, according to Zelensky's claim, are also taking part in the events in eastern Ukraine.
Crimea, the Collapse of the USSR, and Russia's Historical Claims
Zelensky claims that the pretext for occupation is always the same: language. The first victim of this approach was Crimea. He points out that many Russian-speaking people lived on the peninsula, including Russian-speaking Ukrainians. However, according to him, Crimea is a multinational peninsula with indigenous peoples, and deportations of Crimean Tatars took place there, including several waves of expulsion.
Then, in his assessment, Russia moved on to Donbas and the east of the country. Zelensky believes the language issue was used to divide society. He calls this unfair and vile toward people. The Russian side claimed to be protecting the Russian-speaking population, but, according to Zelensky, no one was taking anything away from anyone. Eastern Ukraine borders the Russian Federation, which, in his opinion, made these actions easier.
Identity and the Imperial Rhetoric of the Kremlin
Zelensky cites a statement by Putin made a few days before the invasion began. According to him, Putin claimed that modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia, more precisely, by Bolshevik communist Russia. According to this version, the process began almost immediately after the 1917 revolution. Soviet Ukraine, as the statement says, was the result of Bolshevik policy and may rightfully be called "Ukraine of Vladimir Lenin." Ukraine, according to Putin, never had a tradition of genuine statehood. Zelensky directly says that Putin denies the existence of Ukraine as an independent nation.
Zelensky rejects this dating. Ukraine's history does not begin in 1917. Churches about a thousand years old, painted by Ukrainian masters, have survived in the country. Ukraine, according to him, is the heir of Kievan Rus, a large state with a developed civilization, known in Europe and possessing its own art and traditions. Russia, in his claim, did not exist during that period but appeared later, after Ukraine already existed.
In Zelensky's view, Putin deliberately excludes this history and starts the count from the revolution. The reason is that he is talking about the history of the Soviet Union, not Russia or Ukraine. By doing this, according to Zelensky, Putin is addressing Russians, especially schoolchildren, who receive information at school and do not study the issue more deeply. Zelensky claims that this is how Putin instills in them the idea that their lives are tied to the Soviet Union and that the country is moving toward its restoration.
The Start of the Full-Scale Invasion and the Threat to Kyiv
Zelensky points out that the full-scale war began on February 24, 2022. Missile strikes were launched immediately from the territory of Russia.
The Beginning of the Full-Scale Invasion and the Threat to Kyiv
The attack was carried out from several directions at once. Troops also entered from the territory of Belarus, since this route was the closest to the capital. The offensive advanced on Kyiv from all sides.
The Main Objective of the Invasion
The main objective was the capture of the Ukrainian capital. According to the speaker, Russian forces and separatists who were already operating in the occupied territory of Donbas were counting on achieving it.
Why the Invasion Took Place in February 2022
The host asked why the invasion began specifically in February 2022, rather than earlier or later, and what had changed by that point. He also cited a claim by Donald Trump that Joe Biden was weak, and that, according to Trump, this gave Vladimir Putin the opportunity to attack, because Putin did not respect Biden.
The speaker replied that preparations began at an earlier period. According to him, a summit between Biden and Putin took place in 2021. He could not name the exact date of the summit. The details of the meeting were unknown. Later, reports emerged that the sides had discussed a possible escalation against Ukraine.
Warnings from the Ukrainian Side
In the following months, Ukraine repeatedly raised this issue in its contacts with American partners. The Americans acknowledged that such a scenario was possible. The Ukrainian side asked for the means necessary for defense in the event of a threat of occupation.
Underestimating the Scale of the Threat
A full-scale invasion, according to the speaker, seemed highly unlikely. The experience of the occupation of Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions shaped a different view of how events might develop. No one expected missiles to start falling on cities in a single night. The speaker described the consequences of this strike: children screamed, people ran, and complete chaos broke out. According to him, these moments were horrifying, because missiles were literally flying at peaceful cities.
Drones, Negotiations, and the Position of American Partners
Today Ukraine is repelling attacks by thousands of drones, which it shoots down in the air. In the first days of the full-scale invasion, the situation was different. Around four o'clock in the morning, missiles were falling on people's heads, and everyone was in shock.
Zelensky stated that Putin began the invasion in February because that was his plan. According to Zelensky, Putin told Joe Biden many things, and he believes Biden was told lies.
Zelensky recalls that President Biden intervened in the first minutes or days of the war and offered to evacuate him. Zelensky refused and asked for weapons to defend the country. He believes the partners understood that occupying Ukraine was impossible.
According to Zelensky, the United States may have allowed for the possibility that the conflict could arise and that Ukraine could be occupied. However, no one counted on Ukraine holding out.
Zelensky claims that a day before the invasion, Europeans, who knew less than Americans, spoke with Putin. Putin promised them that there would be no invasion. Zelensky stated that Putin lied to all of them and knew about the upcoming invasion, knew everything.
US Warnings of Invasion and Sanctions Against Russia Before the War ,
The text of the chapter is missing from the request, so it is impossible to present the statements, data, and procedures from this fragment. To prepare the section, please send a transcript or the text of the relevant passage.
Persistent Warnings of an Invasion
Signals of a possible invasion never came in direct form. No interlocutor named a date for an attack or a specific scenario of a full-scale war. The matter concerned cautious diplomatic signals.
The Ukrainian side raised this question repeatedly, because people were worried. The anxiety affected the economy and the exchange rate. The stability of the national currency began to decline, which hit the country's economy.
Ukraine asked the United States to give a clear signal. If the American side believed war was coming, Kyiv asked for weapons and everything possible to be delivered urgently. According to the speaker, in response no one provided anything.
He also asked for sanctions to be imposed. By his account, everyone in Europe was aware of this. He called on President Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia in advance. The logic was that if an invasion was possible, sanctions could stop it before the decision was made final.
Biden replied that sanctions would be imposed in the event of an invasion. According to the speaker, this meant sanctions post factum rather than preventive measures.
The speaker stated that he was not entitled to evaluate the president. At the same time, in his view, that decision was a mistake.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022. In October 2021, the Director of National Intelligence of the United States
Sanctions and Intelligence
Intelligence on the Preparation of the Invasion
The CIA Director informed the leadership of the United States and key NATO allies that Putin was preparing a multi-front invasion. European media published satellite images showing 100,000 Russian troops, tanks, and field hospitals deployed near the borders. In November 2021, the CIA Director personally flew to Moscow and warned Putin directly not to launch an invasion.
In December 2021, the US government declassified intelligence maps and troop strength assessments. According to this data, the strike force could have numbered up to 175,000 troops. Washington took this step to prevent a staged provocation by Russia that could have served as a pretext for an attack.
In late January and early February 2022, the US National Security Advisor publicly stated that the invasion could begin at any moment. He urged foreign citizens to leave Ukraine.
On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion. Strikes were carried out from several directions at once, with Kyiv as the main target.
Allied Reaction: Sanctions and Weapons
Zelensky said that Russia had previously held annual exercises in Belarus, and that partners had perceived them as a demonstration of force. NATO representatives and European leaders, who had received warnings, did not believe in the worst-case scenario. According to Zelensky, Putin assured European leaders that he would not invade. Ukraine's Minister of Defense was invited to these exercises and took part in them.
According to Zelensky, European partners repeated his demands: impose sanctions on Russia and transfer weapons to Ukraine. He claimed that, despite having data on an imminent invasion, the US took neither step. No sanctions were imposed, and no weapons were delivered. In his view, this reinforced doubts about the seriousness of the threat. Many believed that Russia was bluffing and seeking the implementation of the Minsk Agreements. Under these agreements, Ukraine would have had to recognize Donbas and Crimea as non-Ukrainian territories.
Zelensky himself said that he did not believe in a full-scale invasion. In his words, if partners had known about an imminent attack, they would have taken preventive measures. He noted that the invasion nevertheless happened, and that Russia quickly advanced toward Kyiv.
The First Days of the Invasion
Zelensky was with his family when he received a message from his office about missile strikes during the night. He told his wife and children that the war had begun and went to the office, where he was one of the first or second to arrive. He gathered the staff, and the working day began. According to him, it was the most difficult working day since the start of the full-scale war. He told his wife to wake up quickly, that the war had started, and promised to call her.
Zelensky stated that life had completely changed from that day on.
The interviewer cited figures on the scale of the invasion. According to his information, between 150,000 and 190,000 Russian troops were concentrated on Ukraine's border, and some estimates put the figure at 200,000. The size of this force almost matched the total number of active Ukrainian military personnel at that time.
The Defense of Kyiv
Zelensky explained that Ukraine's main forces were located in the east of the country, in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The strongest group of Russian troops and separatists, who held the front line, was also there. Kharkiv, Mariupol, and Donetsk were also important targets for Moscow. The Ukrainian command did not expect the enemy to advance through Belarus toward the capital, so there were no strong forces in that direction. Zelensky called this an absolute fact.
According to him, the Ukrainian army was significantly smaller at that moment. He said that shortly before the invasion he had changed the law and increased the size of the army to 200,000–250,000 personnel. However, it was impossible to resist 200,000 attackers with such a number of troops. In his assessment, defense required an army of the size of today's, about 800,000 personnel.
After the invasion began, Ukraine carried out a mobilization. Volunteers enlisted in the army en masse. The size of the Ukrainian armed forces grew from 200,000 to 800,000 personnel. The Russian force on Ukrainian territory, according to Zelensky, numbered approximately 700,000 troops across all directions.
Zelensky stated that Kyiv held out and the enemy suffered defeat. Russia could not hold the occupied territories due to a shortage of troops. The Armed Forces of Ukraine then pushed it out of the Kyiv and Chernihiv regions and fully restored the front line in that area.
The interviewer pointed to a 64-kilometer column that satellite images recorded at the end of February on one highway leading to Kyiv. Zelensky confirmed that these images were horrifying. According to him, Russian forces seized the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and the entire route to the capital, after which they blockaded Kyiv. The city's residents, in his account, rose to defend it, mobilized, and fought day after day. Russia cut off the supply of food and water. According to Zelensky, this was exactly what the enemy's plan was based on: to force the residents to flee.
The Evacuation Offer
Zelensky said that representatives approached him who advised him to surrender Kyiv, hand over power, and leave the city. He replied that these people should leave his office.
US President Joe Biden offered Zelensky an evacuation when Kyiv was surrounded. Zelensky replied that he needed ammunition, not a ride. Later, some Europeans and politicians from Zelensky's circle made similar offers.
During the invasion, Zelensky's family was in another location, to which they had been taken by security personnel. Zelensky himself moved to a bunker located deep beneath his office. Snipers and special forces fighters were stationed around the building. From the bunker, he maintained contact with the leaders of other countries and held the first video conference with Europeans, calling on them to unite and help Ukraine. According to him, this worked.
Zelensky stated that he went out into the streets, met with people, and demonstrated his presence in Kyiv. Russia spread information that he had fled the country and reported his location in other states. According to Zelensky, the goal of this campaign was to trigger a flight of the population. He claims that, on the orders of the military, he stayed on Bankova Street during the day, appearing before people two or three times a day. The military, as he said, later told him that knowing the president was in the capital gave them determination to defend and liberate Kyiv.
Zelensky refused to leave Kyiv. In his words, doing so would have been a betrayal of basic human decency and the Constitution of Ukraine. He believes he acted in accordance with his duty and does not see any particular choice in his decision.
Assessment of Trump's Role
The interviewer reported that Donald Trump had repeatedly stated that the invasion would not have happened if he had been president. Zelensky replied that no one knows the answer to this question. He emphasized two facts: the invasion happened under President Biden and did not happen under Trump. In his view, Trump had a special relationship with Putin. Friendly relations might have prevented a full-scale invasion.
Zelensky stated that Putin's goal remained unchanged: the occupation of Ukraine. Presidents change, so, in his view, the identity of the US president does not matter as long as Putin remains in power.
The First Days of the Full-Scale Invasion and the Defense of Kyiv
Work Without Pause and the State After Shock
Zelensky said that in the first days of the invasion he did not feel fear. He described his state as being focused on the tasks of the moment. According to him, he was constantly on his feet: making decisions, calling heads of agencies, going out into the street and returning, and communicating with the military. He held dozens of conversations daily with leaders, and in the first days he slept about 15 minutes.
Zelensky explained that he truly grasped the scale of what was happening about 20 days after the start of the war. Previously, by his account, he had been operating in crisis management mode. He noted that this reaction is typical of many people: under shock, they concentrate and start acting. The awareness of the tragedy, he said, came later, when there was an opportunity to relax.
Coordination and Logistics
The main task of the first days, according to Zelensky, was communication. He negotiated with leaders of different countries and set specific objectives: delivering cargo and organizing supplies. He said that at night he spoke with Polish President Andrzej Duda, including about a weapons depot. To speed up decisions, leaders were woken up in the middle of the night. Zelensky acknowledged that such an approach would be unacceptable now, but, he said, at that moment there was no other way out.
Among the priorities he named were unblocking Kyiv, the return of troops, repelling the enemy, communications, and supplies of food and water for the population. According to him, many cities were cut off. He also specifically mentioned the banking system and the operation of payment cards, since Ukraine, in his assessment, is a highly digitalized country.
Information War and Pace of Action
Zelensky stated that the Ukrainian side acted faster than the Russian side. Russian forces quickly advanced toward Kyiv. After they were halted near the capital, Ukraine, he said, gained an advantage in the information space. He claimed that the Ukrainian side broke the wave of Russian disinformation and consistently refuted it until Russia acknowledged the loss of the capital. He added that Ukraine's partners, seeing the country's determination not to surrender, began providing assistance.
Expectations of a Quick Victory and Russia's Miscalculations
The host reported that, according to a widespread view, Vladimir Putin expected to take Kyiv within a few days. Russian assault units, according to his information, were carrying rations for only 3–10 days and parade uniforms for a victory parade. State media, he said, accidentally published a pre-prepared statement of victory on the third day. Putin himself, as the host noted, did not publicly say the phrase about three days, but a number of well-known representatives of Russian state media openly said that the capture would take a matter of days.
Zelensky replied that Putin's main mistake lies in not recognizing Ukraine as a separate nation and state. In his view, Putin considers Ukraine part of Russia and believed the army would enter without serious resistance, the president would flee, and the Ukrainian flag would be replaced with the Russian one. Zelensky claimed that parade uniforms were found in the tanks, and that Russia intended to hold a pseudo-victory parade in Kyiv, on Khreshchatyk and on Independence Square.
According to him, the main miscalculation on the Russian side was underestimating the resistance. To hold the cities captured along the route to Kyiv, he assessed, hundreds of thousands of servicemen were required, that is, twice as many as were deployed. If there had been no resistance, fewer garrisons would have been needed. Zelensky also said that dozens and hundreds of armored vehicles were lost near Kyiv and in the Hostomel area. Some of the equipment, he said, broke into the capital, where residents set it on fire.
Donald Trump's Position on the Tanks' Route
The host relayed the words of Donald Trump, who said the war should have ended quickly. According to Trump, if the commander had not turned onto a dirt road but had continued along the paved highway, the tanks would have reached Kyiv within a day. Trump linked the delay to downpours, calling them the strongest in ten years, and to the equipment getting stuck in mud. He also said that Ukraine had lost a huge number of people over five years.
Zelensky responded that Russia did indeed encircle Kyiv, reached it, and occupied settlements on the way to the capital. Some settlements, he said, Russia bypassed, while in others it encountered resistance. He stated that he does not understand what wrong turn Trump is talking about, and that the turn is irrelevant: the decisive factor was the loss of equipment and the resistance of Ukrainian military personnel and civilians.
Crimea in 2014 and the Causes of the Full-Scale War
Zelensky compared the operation in Crimea in 2014 with the events near Kyiv. In Crimea, he said, about 3 million people lived, and at most dozens or hundreds of people entered Crimea. About 3 million people also lived in Kyiv, and hundreds of thousands opposed the invading army. The difference, he said, is that in Crimea there was no resistance, while in Kyiv residents defended the city.
Zelensky agreed with Trump that if the actions in Crimea had received a worthy rebuff, in his opinion, there would have been no full-scale war. Putin, seeing the easy capture of Crimea, decided that Kyiv could also be taken easily, he said. Zelensky emphasized that he does not blame anyone, but points to the consequences of the absence of a rebuff.
Hostomel
The host asked about the battle for the Antonov airport in Hostomel. Zelensky explained that for Russia, capturing airports was a key element of the plan. Hostomel, he said, was one of the airports where a large airborne assault group could land. The plan, as he described it, envisaged blocking Kyiv, seizing airports and television towers, intercepting information and logistics, and halting supplies of food and weapons. Deprived of leadership, he said, Ukraine would have been left without governance.
According to Zelensky, in Hostomel Russian paratroopers landed by air and captured the airport, but Ukrainian units of the National Guard and special forces then launched a counterattack. The Ukrainian side, he said, itself blew up the runway to prevent Russia from using the airport, and air defense forces shot down several Russian transport helicopters. Hostomel changed hands several times and was ultimately liberated. Zelensky said that if Russia had held the airport, it could have seized most of the capital.
He also reported that the National Guard, which is an internal troops force, was the first to enter the fight, since the main army had not yet managed to deploy. Army units were then transferred there. Similar fierce battles, he said, took place for Hostomel, Moshchun, and several small towns near Kyiv.
Bucha and Mass Graves
Zelensky said that Bucha was occupied and called what happened there genocide, which is recognized by everyone. According to him, after the city was liberated, hundreds of bodies were found. He claimed that people were tortured, had their hands tied, and were then buried in pits. He reported a mass grave in which, according to his information, about 500 people were located. He also stated that Russian military personnel looted, broke into homes, killed, took household appliances, and committed sexual violence.
Zelensky recounted that after the liberation of Bucha he went there himself and ordered that journalists be invited so that the world could see what was happening. He stressed that bodies of residents, including children, adults, and elderly people, lay on the streets. At the moment of liberation, he said, the anger toward Russian military personnel became very strong. He reported that the graves discovered included the bodies of tortured adults and children.
Zelensky also said that attempts were made to portray what happened in Bucha as a staged production. According to him, journalists worked in the city, and as a result the world saw the bodies of the dead. He cited the testimony of an elderly man who survived the occupation of Bucha during World War II, who, according to Zelensky, said that the fascists did not treat people like that. Zelensky confirmed that there is evidence and criminal cases.
He also compared these events with discoveries of mass graves in other countries and stated that during the blockade of Kyiv, Russian military personnel hunted animals and people from military vehicles. He described such actions as mockery of people. On this basis, Zelensky asked how, after everything that has happened, one can listen to Putin and forgive him.
Seeking Compromise and Negotiating the War
Compromise and Ceasefire
Zelensky stated that Ukraine needs to find a compromise. In his words, a ceasefire is the only possible first step. He believes that sitting down at the negotiating table is in itself a major compromise. He has repeatedly tried to explain to the President of the United States that Ukraine is making serious concessions, and he has asked him to understand this position. According to him, the point is to fix the front line where it currently stands.
The Impossibility of Forgiveness
Zelensky claims that no one can put themselves in the place of the relatives of people whose children were subjected to torture. In his words, no one wants to forgive. People cannot be forced to forgive. Hatred will not disappear, and time and justice are needed to weaken it. He stated directly that such a thing cannot be forgiven.
Bucha and a Change in Attitude Toward the War
Zelensky called the day in Bucha the hardest day in the last four years. He saw the bodies of people lying in the street. He had never seen anything like it before. After that, in his words, everything changed. He said that he used to think people make mistakes but do not commit such acts. Now he speaks of evil that, in his assessment, is of a different nature. He admitted that until then he had never wanted to kill a person and had never felt anything like it. He described it as pure vengeance. In his words, such things are not forgotten over time, and conversations about what happened bring those memories back.
Revenge, Justice, and the Conditions for Peace
Zelensky noted that as president he is obliged to remain calm and act diplomatically. At the same time, he does not consider it possible to forgive everything and return to normal trade relations, for example the supply of gas or diesel fuel, as if nothing had happened. He stated that he dreams only of ending the war and seeks justice. In his view, court and justice are necessary, otherwise the emptiness in people will not heal. The revenge of people who have lost everything, in his words, creates a risk of continued military action. Therefore, peace cannot be simple. A just peace requires that the guilty be punished. He considers it necessary to show the path by which this will happen, even if not now.
Personal Consequences and Family
Zelensky said that the war has changed him irreversibly. He described this as a reassessment of values. In his words, his wife Olena would say that he has changed very much and that she notices other values in him. He wants to be with his children and wife and to keep his loved ones close. According to him, a person is alone in war. Before the war he had friends, business contacts, and communication that he no longer has.
Personal Life, Family, and the Price of Politics
Family and Children
Zelensky said he constantly misses his family, even when his wife and children are nearby. According to him, the reason is his habit of immersing himself completely in work. He emphasized that he does not complain. He chose this path himself. He did not choose the war, but, in his words, it fell upon his life and the life of his generation.
He stated that all of Ukraine's children have grown up during the war. In his assessment, many children's childhoods have passed under wartime conditions, and this is sad. At the same time, he expressed confidence that peace will be established in any case.
He said that his daughter had become an adult over the last four years. He also noted that her English had improved. According to him, he and his daughter are very close, as he is with the dog.
Communication with the children, according to Zelensky, depends on having time. When he has time, he tries to be with them or call them. He noted that today many ways of staying in touch are available, and they communicate online.
Business and Priorities
Zelensky reported that he has been involved in business since the age of 18 and has managed startups. According to him, business kept him away from his loved ones. He acknowledged that a situation in which the country is under invasion and he is its leader is incomparable to that experience. He expressed doubt about the possibility of maintaining a full presence in his children's lives under such circumstances.
He agreed that presence is important. According to him, in the past, business constantly occupied all of his time. Reflecting on the war, in his words, showed that business is in second place. He named the people who are close to him as the most important. Time, in his words, is lost forever.
Wife Elena
Zelensky called his wife Elena his support throughout this period. He said that they support each other. According to him, their relationship is based on love, respect, and mutual interest. He considers mutual respect very important. He also stated that they find each other interesting and feel good together.
Mother and Daily Calls
Zelensky's mother, according to him, calls him every day. Her first question usually concerns whether he answered the call. He recounted that, being busy with work, he sometimes misses her calls. According to him, on one occasion she called twelve times. Now they have agreed to talk at least once a day. His mother asks about his health, the health of the children, and when Putin will end the war. Zelensky replies that the authorities are doing everything possible.
Occupied Territories
Zelensky named Crimea as the first occupied territory. Then, according to him, Russia seized the Sea of Azov, which he called Ukraine's internal sea. He stated that Russia turned it into an internal sea and that the Azov is now fully under Russian control. He also reported that Russia captured Mariupol and Berdyansk. According to him, Kerch, located on the Black Sea coast, created conditions under which Ukraine cannot reach the sea. He then moved on to describe the following day.
Ситуация на фронте и территориальные вопросы wh ere ...TBD
Гуманитарная ситуация в Олешках
In Oleshky there are people, including children, who are left without food and other essential resources. According to Zelensky, the Russian side is not letting them through. Ukraine, according to his information, is working to open a corridor. He named the number of people remaining there: about 2,500.
Контроль над территорией
Kherson is divided by the Dnipro. Ukrainian forces control the right bank, where the population lives, while the enemy is on the left. According to Zelensky, this is precisely why the enemy is shelling Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Ukraine has regained control of Kherson as a major city.
Zelensky stated that Russia has seized Crimea and parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Kyiv and Kherson, in his words, could not be held, and these territories remain under Ukrainian control. He pointed out on the map the Kharkiv region, Kramatorsk, Yelanets and Makiivka, which, in his claim, are under Russian control. The Zaporizhzhia region, according to him, remains under Ukrainian control.
Zelensky estimated the territory he indicated on the map at roughly 18–19% of Ukraine's territory. He acknowledged that the sides' maps differ and accused Moscow of distorting information for its own population.
Удары по западным и центральным регионам
Zelensky stated that Russia is constantly attacking Ukraine with missiles and drones. He named several cities that, in his words, were struck on the day of the interview: Lutsk, Kyiv, Pryluky and Zhytomyr. In Pryluky, 23 people were killed; he said he saw this place together with the British Foreign Secretary. Zhytomyr, according to him, is under constant shelling. Odesa is also being shelled.
Rivne and Lviv, according to Zelensky, are subject to fewer strikes. He explained this by the distance of the western regions from the line of contact and from the border with Russia. Therefore, there are, in his words, fewer massive strikes there.
Цели России и требования Москвы
Zelensky stated that Russia intends to capture Zaporizhzhia but cannot do so. In his words, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Mykolaiv are targets, although Moscow does not say this publicly.
Zelensky stated that Russia demands the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the eastern regions. According to him, this concerns Sloviansk, Kramatorsk and Druzhkivka, and then the Dnipropetrovsk region, including Pavlohrad. He called Kryvyi Rih his hometown and Nikopol a major industrial, engineering and manufacturing center. In his assessment, handing over these cities would create a serious risk, since they form a fortified line of defense. He warned that if Russia advances further, it could seize a significant number of Ukrainian cities.
Гарантии безопасности и перемирие
Zelensky stated that Ukraine is open to discussing security guarantees, including the option of joining NATO. According to him, no one is giving guarantees. He named Ukraine's main concession as agreeing to a ceasefire, which, in his words, cost a large number of lives. Russia, according to his information, demands further withdrawal of Ukrainian troops. Zelensky asked what security guarantees would remain if Ukraine withdrew its troops, and noted that such a demand is unfair.
Оценка ядерного риска
Asked about the use of nuclear weapons, Zelensky answered that such thoughts arise for many people after Russia's actions. He expressed confidence that Russia will not take this risk, since it would then have no allies left.
Energy Crisis and Russia's Position in World Politics
Nuclear Risk
The use of nuclear weapons remains too dangerous even for nuclear powers, including the United States and China. If one country uses such a weapon, it will set a precedent. In a conflict in another region, such as the Middle East, the weapon could be used again, a second and a third time.
Zelensky said he does not believe Putin will risk using nuclear weapons. He described Putin as part of a system that will keep him in power until the end of his days. According to him, Putin will leave the Kremlin only when his life ends. The transfer of power will happen in the physical sense. Zelensky said he is completely certain of this.
Trump's Statements on Diesel Fuel
According to Zelensky, because of the global energy crisis, Trump reached an agreement with Russia on diesel fuel supplies. In addition, Trump asked Ukraine not to attack Russia's energy infrastructure. Zelensky denied this information.
Zelensky referred to a video recording in which Trump describes this situation. Trump said that Zelensky could have settled the war many times but is not doing so. According to him, the war should not have been started. He also claimed that if the elections in Ukraine had not been rigged, he would be president and there would be no war.
Trump said Ukraine may strike any targets in Russia except oil refineries, because this creates a global problem. He stated that Russia supplies a significant share of diesel fuel worldwide. According to him, Zelensky seeks to create problems for the whole world, as well as for American farmers and ranch owners who depend on diesel fuel. Trump claimed that Ukraine had been warned of a serious shortage and asked not to attack diesel facilities, but strikes on them were carried out anyway. He said the strikes must stop. Trump also said that Ukraine needs a new president.
Zelensky's Response on the Impact of Diesel Exports
Zelensky said that Russia's diesel fuel exports have practically no effect on the situation. The volume of these exports is so insignificant that it has no impact whatsoever on prices in the United States. He called the claim to the contrary completely false.
Zelensky also noted that Ukraine does not attack Russia's energy infrastructure without reason. It retaliates because Russia attacks Ukraine's power grid. Russian strikes leave people without electricity. Ukraine does not produce enough oil, gas, and diesel fuel, but the greatest damage is caused precisely by the lack of electricity. Ukrainian strikes on Russian diesel fuel, according to him, hit Russia's revenues. Russia, he claims, earns money from selling diesel and spends it on weapons.
Energy Ceasefire and Putin's Position
Zelensky said he has repeatedly proposed that Trump mediate in reaching an energy ceasefire. According to him, people must have light. He also noted that Russia can sell oil if it wishes.
Zelensky claimed that Trump had failed to reach an agreement with Putin. Putin, according to Zelensky, rejected an energy ceasefire. Zelensky believes that Trump is blaming Ukraine, not Putin, for the rise in diesel fuel prices in the United States. He called such an explanation to the American people completely wrong.
Responsibility and the Situation in the Middle East
Zelensky said he has good relations with Trump. However, he considers it wrong and unacceptable that Trump places responsibility on him for Russia's aggression and its killings. According to him, such an approach distorts the context and is unfair. Zelensky said he responded to Trump: "This is unfair. A ceasefire." Trump, according to Zelensky, replied that the sides cannot reach an agreement.
Zelensky said that if the sides cannot agree but still need diesel fuel, the situation still requires a solution. He believes that the focus on Ukraine distracts attention from Iran and the events in the Middle East. According to him, the entire volume of supplies is blocked there. The Strait of Hormuz is closed, and this is the root of the problem. Instead, the blame is placed on Ukraine, and he, as the leader of the country, is becoming a target.
Zelensky said that Trump cannot force Putin to end the war and agree to an energy ceasefire.
Negotiations, Sanctions, and Domestic Political Pressure in the United States
Request for Air Defense Systems
Zelensky stated that Ukraine is requesting missiles for air defense systems. According to him, Ukraine will not attack Russia and intends to protect the energy sector. He said he had asked Trump to supply the missiles, but not for free. He also said that European countries are financing these deliveries and that a relevant agreement exists. According to him, the United States is not transferring missiles to Ukraine and cites the impossibility of such a transfer. Zelensky claims that the US is transferring Patriots to Middle Eastern countries and has previously transferred significant volumes of weapons to them. He called this situation unfair.
Energy and Diesel Prices
Zelensky stated that he is expected to show restraint in response to energy strikes on Ukraine. He linked this situation to rising diesel prices in the United States. In his assessment, diesel prices in the US do not depend on the volume of Russian oil sales. He expressed 100 percent confidence in this. Zelensky also stated that American companies export energy resources and that the export of American energy is not prohibited. He noted that the US president cannot ban private-sector exports and that such a ban would make no sense, since sales bring in revenue.
Trump's Role and Sanctions Against Russia
In Zelensky's view, Trump can bring Putin to the negotiating table without great effort. To do so, according to him, Trump must speak about Putin as harshly as he speaks about Zelensky himself. Zelensky noted that sanctions are already on the US president's desk. He emphasized that the decision on sanctions was made not by Trump but by Congress, which voted for tough measures. Trump, according to Zelensky, can impose them on his own. Asked about the reasons for the inaction, Zelensky replied that he does not know them. He allowed that there may be a special relationship between the leaders, or that economic agreements or other factors may matter. He explicitly stated that he can only speculate.
Elections in Ukraine and Elections in the US
Zelensky cited recent polls according to which about 76 percent of Ukrainians currently do not want elections. He also suggested that ahead of the US midterm elections, Trump may be more concerned about energy prices in America than about the situation in Ukraine.
Hopes for the Future and Conclusion of the Interview
Zelensky expressed hope that the war will end. He stated that time is on the side of those who are open to honest dialogue and ready to fight, and that therefore time will work for Ukraine. He expressed good wishes to the United States, which, in his words, has found itself in a difficult situation. He linked this to events in the world, to the actions of Russia and Iran, and to the fact that, in his assessment, some people strive for bloodshed and wars. He wished America to maintain its strength, peaceful existence, and the opportunity for families to live calmly and gather for family dinners. Zelensky also thanked the US for its assistance to Ukraine and stated that Ukraine will not forget it. At the end, the interviewer mentioned difficulties related to Starlink and the internet. Zelensky replied that the dialogue had gone well and thanked his interlocutor.
The Start of the War and Its Consequences in Ukraine
Interview with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about the first days of Russia's full-scale invasion, which began on February 24, 2022. Zelensky admits he did not expect a full-scale invasion. He told his family about the start of the war and left the house. Satellite images recorded a 64 km column moving toward Kyiv. According to him, 200,000 people were coming against the country, and it was practically impossible to defend it. Missiles fell on the city, and Zelensky was in a bunker set up right in his office. US President Joe Biden offered help with evacuation, but Zelensky replied that he needed ammunition, not transport. He explained that he could not abandon the people, and that volunteers came to the army, thanks to whom its strength grew from 200,000 to 800,000 people. He says that after this, Ukrainian forces began to advance and press harder. He named the liberation of Bucha as the hardest day over the last four years. There lay the bodies of the dead: children, adults and elderly people, with their hands tied, showing signs of torture and execution, buried in pits. Zelensky compares this to the discovery of a mass grave of 500 tortured people in the US or Britain, and states that such things cannot be forgiven, which is why he disagrees with Donald Trump's statement about the need for a compromise. Asked about a realistic path to ending the war and how he is feeling, Zelensky said it is hard for him, because he experiences everything together with the country and its people. However, he is confident that tomorrow will come and that good will triumph, so he maintains optimism despite understanding the complex reality. He acknowledges that the level of hope fluctuates, and that emotional breakdowns are especially hard for families who have lost loved ones, including children, spouses or mothers, and that they have it much harder than he does.
- The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia began on February 24, 2022
- Zelensky admitted that he did not expect a full-scale invasion
- Satellite images recorded a 64 km column moving toward Kyiv
- According to Zelensky, 200,000 people were coming against the country, and it was practically impossible to defend it
- Missiles were falling on the city, and Zelensky was in a bunker set up in his office
- Joe Biden offered help with evacuation; Zelensky asked for ammunition, not transport
- Zelensky stated that he could not abandon the people
- The army's strength grew from 200,000 to 800,000 people thanks to volunteers
- Zelensky named the liberation of Bucha as the hardest day in the last four years
- In Bucha, bodies of children, adults and elderly people were found with their hands tied, showing signs of torture and execution, buried in pits
- Zelensky compared the discovery of a mass grave of 500 tortured people to hypothetical cases in the US or Britain
- Zelensky disagrees with Donald Trump's statement about the need for a compromise and says such things cannot be forgiven
- Zelensky maintains optimism, believing that good will triumph
- Zelensky acknowledges that the level of hope fluctuates and that families who lost loved ones are going through it harder than he is
Death of Children and Destruction of Homes
The story describes a missile strike on a children's playground that killed children and adults, including passersby. The siren did not help because of the missile's speed: only a few seconds were left to react. Both children and adults died. Among the dead was a couple who were simply walking by. Residential buildings stand nearby, and some parents watched their children die through their windows. By tradition, flowers are brought to the site of such a tragedy for adults, and toys for children. The narrator visited the site and says that his pain amounts to less than 10% of the pain of the parents of the dead. He also describes how children go down to shelters every night when the air raid siren sounds, and some of them have died. There are children who have never known peace. In an interview, the narrator admits that at the beginning of the invasion he said he did not deserve the right to sleep. Almost 5 years into the war, he does not sleep and every night discusses with air defense operators what needs to be done now, including moving equipment from other regions. Sleeping 8 hours a night has become something completely new for him. His strongest experience is connected with presenting the title Hero of Ukraine, the highest honorary award, to the parents of children who were soldiers and died. In such moments, he says, he ceases to exist; it is not just pain but something terrible.
- A missile hit a children's playground; because of its speed, the siren did not help, and only a few seconds were left.
- Children and adults died, including a couple who were passing by.
- Residential buildings are next to the playground; some parents saw their children die through the windows.
- By tradition, flowers are brought to the site of the tragedy for adults, and toys for children.
- The narrator visited the site of the tragedy; his pain is less than 10% of the pain of the parents of the dead.
- The air raid siren sounds every night; children go down to shelters, and some of them have died.
- There are children who have never known peace.
- At the beginning of the invasion, the narrator said he did not deserve the right to sleep.
- Almost 5 years of war; the narrator does not sleep.
- Every night he talks with air defense operators, including about moving equipment from other regions.
- Sleeping 8 hours a night has become something new for him.
- He presents the Hero of Ukraine title to the parents of children who were soldiers and died, and feels a terrible sense that he ceases to exist.
Personal Choice and the Leader's Responsibility
## Personal Choice and the Leader's Responsibility The narrator describes the emotional toll on himself when speaking with parents of fallen soldiers: people often just ask to be hugged, and strong people in such moments stop being themselves and try to endure. He respects such moments, but they are hard to bear, and he understands the parents' pain, which he says is terrible and which he would not wish on anyone. The parents lost not a child on a playground but a soldier, and knew this was possible, yet knowing and losing are completely different things. He admits he is not perfect and not the strongest, but tries to set an example. Children are the source of his strength: he believes he must be an example for them, be brave, but not hide his pain. Human nature is both a weakness and a source of strength. Children keep him grounded, and he wants them to be proud of him. In childhood he was born in the Soviet Union, when Ukraine was part of it, and grew up in independent Ukraine. His children were born in an independent country without "gray" shades and are considered patriots who love Ukraine. The family was academic, from an ordinary family, not very wealthy; his father was an honest man, a professor. He received an education and upbringing, and considers his parents' love a sufficient reason for gratitude. He was born in Kryvyi Rih. As a child he changed his dreams: he wanted to become a diplomat and a border guard, then graduated from the law faculty, but became interested in media and began working in that field. At 17 he showed interest in comedy.
- Parents of fallen soldiers lost not a child but a soldier, and knew this was possible, but knowing and losing are different things
- People often just ask to be hugged; strong people in such moments stop being themselves and try to endure
- The narrator respects such moments but finds them hard to bear; he would not wish such pain on anyone
- He considers himself not perfect and not the strongest, but tries to set an example
- His main support is his children; he must be an example to them, be brave, but not hide his pain
- Human nature is both a weakness and a source of strength
- Born in Kryvyi Rih to an academic family in the Soviet Union, grew up in independent Ukraine
- His children were born in an independent country and are considered patriots who love Ukraine
- His father was an honest man and a professor; the family was not very wealthy
- He considers his education and upbringing, as well as his parents' love, a sufficient reason for gratitude
- As a child he wanted to become a diplomat and a border guard; he graduated from law school and switched to media
- At 17 he showed interest in comedy
Zelensky's Comedy Career and the Series «Servant of the People»
Zelensky worked as a comedy actor and screenwriter with a team until age 26, then at 26 founded his own media company. At 28 he won the Ukrainian version of the show «Dancing with the Stars», after which he voiced Paddington in a Ukrainian film. He acknowledges that the character is close to him, and notes that after being elected president he received offers to voice the next Paddington film but declined. Between the ages of 34 and 37 he appeared in several feature films and played the lead role of history teacher Vasily Goloborodko in the satirical series «Servant of the People», where the teacher accidentally becomes president. According to him, the idea of the character, a 'man of the people' with no political experience, had lived in him for 10–12 years and seemed relevant when Ukraine was changing and the government was causing discontent. The idea proved in demand, and he himself was later elected president.
- Zelensky worked in comedy until age 26, as a comedy actor and screenwriter, and at 26 founded his own company.
- At 28 he won the Ukrainian version of the show «Dancing with the Stars».
- He voiced Paddington in a Ukrainian film and said the character deeply resonated with him.
- After being elected president, he was offered the chance to voice the next Paddington film, but he declined.
- Between the ages of 34 and 37 he appeared in several feature films.
- He played the lead role of a teacher who accidentally becomes president in the satirical series «Servant of the People».
- The idea of the character, a man of the people without political experience who becomes president, had lived in him for 10–12 years.
- He believes the idea became relevant when Ukraine was changing and the government was causing discontent.
- He himself was later elected President of Ukraine.
Political Satire and Russia's Betrayal After the Occupation of Crimea
The speaker says that registering the "Servant of the People" party in Ukraine was not a pre-calculated political plan. The TV series "Servant of the People" was very popular, and an earlier political satire project, also popular, had already given the speaker political experience. According to him, the decision to try politics matured after the occupation of Crimea and Donbas, which changed the situation and created a sense that something was wrong in the country. Full-scale war had not yet begun, but a sense of war was already present. At that time, the speaker's companies did business with Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia, with offices and projects there, including filming. The speaker did not want to abandon everything and felt betrayed by Russia. This period changed him as well. He denies the version of a pre-planned "series, then party" scenario, acknowledges that such an opinion exists, and considers it acceptable. In his words, the party registration coincided with the mood of society, its inner state, determination and desire, so it was a coincidence of many factors.
- The TV series "Servant of the People" was very popular.
- In parallel, an earlier political satire project, also very popular, existed and gave the speaker political experience.
- According to the speaker, the decision to get into politics was not a pre-calculated plan.
- After the occupation of Crimea and Donbas, the situation changed and a feeling emerged that something was wrong in the country.
- Full-scale war had not yet begun, but a sense of war was already present.
- The speaker's companies did business with Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia, with offices and projects there, including filming.
- The speaker did not want to abandon the business and felt betrayed by Russia.
- The registration of the "Servant of the People" party coincided with the mood of society, its inner state, and the speaker's determination.
- The speaker acknowledges that some people believe everything was planned, and considers such an opinion normal.
Historical Connection and Ukraine's Independence in 1991
The interviewer and the interlocutor discuss when the war began. The interlocutor believes the count starts with the occupation of Crimea in 2014, not with Ukraine regaining independence in 1991 in the 20th century. He acknowledges that the occupation proceeded slowly and did not look like a war, because Ukraine did not resist. Russia long denied that the “polite people,” called “little green men,” were its citizens. Ukrainian authorities did not give a clear order to defend territory and borders. In the interlocutor's view, the main mistake was that Ukraine did not drive out the invaders, and if there had been an order to defend the country, the full-scale war in its current form would probably not have happened. He then describes his family history: his grandfather went through World War II from beginning to end, and several of his grandfather's brothers were killed by the Nazis. Many relatives on both sides of the family died at the hands of the fascists. He therefore considers Russia's accusations that there are Nazis in Ukraine absurd. In his words, Ukrainians understand well what it means to live under fascists, since Ukraine was fully occupied during World War II. He claims that Belarus and Ukraine were occupied by Nazi Germany, which lost a huge number of soldiers there, while Russia was not occupied. Therefore, he calls Putin's statements about “denazification” and “liberating” Ukraine from fascists monstrous, since Ukrainians themselves fought the fascists and liberated their own lands. At the end, the host asks him to explain the historical background of the events to a sixteen-year-old teenager, including the reasons Russia entered Crimea and Vladimir Putin's views. The interlocutor begins answering with the words that there was an empire, but the answer breaks off.
- The interviewer links the interlocutor's political activity to the change in the situation in Ukraine after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.
- Four years after the annexation of Crimea, the interlocutor announced his intention to run for president.
- The interlocutor believes that Ukraine, as a new state, gained independence in 1991 in the 20th century.
- In his view, the war began with the occupation of Crimea in 2014.
- The occupation of Crimea proceeded slowly and initially did not look like a war, because Ukraine did not resist.
- Russia long denied that the people who seized Crimea were its citizens.
- The invaders in Crimea were called “little green men” because their uniforms made it impossible to determine their affiliation.
- Ukrainian authorities did not give clear orders to defend the land and borders against armed seizure.
- According to the interlocutor, the main mistake was that Ukraine did not drive out the invaders.
- The interlocutor believes that if there had been an order to defend the country, the full-scale war in its current form probably would not have happened.
- The interlocutor's grandfather went through World War II from beginning to end.
- Several brothers were in the grandfather's family, and all of them were killed by the Nazis.
- The interlocutor has very few relatives on both sides of the family, many of whom were killed by the fascists.
- The interlocutor calls Russia's accusations that there are Nazis in Ukraine absurd.
- According to his claim, Ukraine was fully occupied during World War II.
- Belarus and Ukraine were occupied by Nazi Germany, which lost a huge number of soldiers there.
- According to his claim, Russia was not occupied during World War II.
- The interlocutor calls Putin's statements that he is liberating Ukraine from fascists absurd, since Ukrainians themselves fought the fascists.
- The host asks the interlocutor to explain the background of what is happening to a sixteen-year-old teenager, including the reasons Russia entered Crimea and Putin's views.
- The interlocutor's answer begins with the words “there was an empire” and breaks off, so the explanation of the background is not completed in the text.
Crimea, the Collapse of the USSR, and Russia's Historical Claims
The Soviet Union is described as an empire that included many states, now independent. The author argues that all empires follow this pattern: they exist for some time and then collapse. He does not elaborate on the historical context, assuming it is already understood. According to him, holding such a large territory with many people is possible only through autocracy, tyranny, feudalism, and slavery, but never through freedom, so empires cannot survive on freedom. He calls this very important: empires fall apart because people want to be free. People compare their lives in the empire with life in other countries, even small ones. They see how events unfold there, how people live, how they move freely, choose any partner, any hair color, music, and clothing. The fragment breaks off in an unfinished enumeration.
- The Soviet Union is described as an empire that included a large number of states, now independent.
- The author claims that all empires sooner or later collapse.
- The author does not explain the historical context, considering it obvious.
- According to the author, an empire can be held together only through autocracy, tyranny, feudalism, and slavery, but not through freedom.
- The author argues that empires do not survive on freedom.
- Empires fall apart because people want to be free.
- People compare their lives in the empire with life in other countries, including small ones.
- People see the development of other countries and their way of life there, including freedom of movement, choice of partner, hair color, music, and clothing.
- The fragment ends in an unfinished enumeration.
Identity and Imperial Rhetoric of the Kremlin
The speaker claims that the Soviet Union and similar empires kept citizens in information isolation: the "Iron Curtain" prevented people from seeing the West (Europe, the USA, Great Britain, Asia), and control over television and the absence of the internet created a complete information vacuum. He compares such states to fish aquariums, noting that the Soviet Union and North Korea are simply aquariums of different sizes. In his account, the collapse of the USSR brought independence to countries, including Ukraine, which gained its own language, music, and clothing. He contrasts this with freedom of travel and cultural diversity (Thailand, Japan, USA) and argues that empires fall apart because the nations within them seek their own independence. The speaker asserts that nostalgia for the USSR has persisted among people and that Putin, a former president of Russia, set the goal of restoring the empire. According to the speaker, Putin is a "purely Soviet man" who served in the KGB in Germany and believes that another major country, the USA, is to blame for the collapse of the USSR. The speaker describes Soviet-American relations as a geopolitical confrontation: allies in World War II, enemies during the Cold War. In the speaker's view, for Putin restoring the Soviet Union means above all the return of Ukraine, which he calls the "second-number country".
- The speaker claims that the "Iron Curtain" hid the West (Europe, the USA, Great Britain, Asia) from Soviet citizens, creating a complete information vacuum.
- In the speaker's view, control over television and the absence of the internet limited access to information, and people lived "like fish in an aquarium."
- The speaker calls the Soviet Union and North Korea aquariums of different sizes.
- According to the speaker, after the collapse of the USSR, countries including Ukraine became independent and gained their own language, music, and clothing.
- The speaker claims that empires fall apart because the nations within them strive for their own independence.
- The speaker notes that nostalgia for the Soviet Union has persisted among people.
- The speaker claims that Putin, a former president of Russia, set the goal of restoring the empire and bringing back the Soviet Union.
- According to the speaker, Putin is a "purely Soviet man" who served in the KGB in Germany.
- The speaker quotes Putin saying that the greatest catastrophe of the 20th century was the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- The speaker claims that Putin considers the USA responsible for the collapse of the USSR.
- The speaker describes the USSR and the USA as allies in World War II and enemies during the Cold War.
- In the speaker's view, for Putin restoring the USSR means above all the return of Ukraine, which he calls the second-number country.
Denial of Ukrainian Statehood and World War II
The Beginning of the Full-Scale Invasion and the Threat to Kyiv
Translation into English
Drones, Negotiations, and the Position of American Partners
Today thousands of drones are shot down over Ukraine every day, and the Ukrainian side is fighting. However, in the first days of the war, at about 4:00 a.m., missiles fell on people's heads, and everyone was in shock. According to the speaker, the invasion had been planned for February. It was Putin's personal plan, and he apparently told Biden a lot. The speaker recalls that President Biden later intervened; in the first minutes or days of the war, Biden called him and offered to evacuate him. Many offered help, but the speaker asked for weapons to defend the country. In his view, at some point Russia realized that occupying Ukraine was impossible. He believes that the US may have considered the possibility of conflict and an occupation of Ukraine, but no one expected Ukraine to hold out. The speaker also claims that a day before the invasion, Europeans, who knew less than Americans, spoke with Putin, and Putin promised there would be no invasion. In the speaker's opinion, Putin lied to everyone because he knew exactly about the invasion and knew everything. At the end, the interviewer asks when the speaker first received a call that Russia was planning an invasion of Ukraine, but there is no answer in the draft.
- Thousands of drones are shot down every day.
- At about 4:00 a.m. in the first days of the war, missiles fell on people's heads.
- According to the speaker, the invasion was planned for February and was Putin's personal plan.
- Biden offered to evacuate the speaker in the first minutes or days of the war.
- The speaker asked allies for weapons to defend the country.
- The speaker believes Russia realized that occupying Ukraine was impossible.
- Europeans, who knew less than Americans, spoke with Putin a day before the invasion.
- Putin promised Europeans there would be no invasion, but according to the speaker, he knew about it in advance.
- The interviewer asks when the speaker first learned of the invasion plans, but there is no answer in the draft.
US Warnings of an Invasion and Sanctions Against Russia Before the Start of the War
The chapter draft was not provided: after the words "Chapter draft:" there is no text, so names, dates, figures, and claims cannot be extracted. To extract facts, the chapter text in English must be provided.
- The input chapter draft is missing: there is no text for analysis after the label "Chapter draft:".
- Names, dates, numbers, procedures, and claims from the video were not extracted, because there is no source text.
- The chapter title is set: US warnings of an invasion and sanctions against Russia before the start of the war.
Persistent Warnings of Invasion
The speaker describes that signals of a possible Russian invasion were cautious diplomatic hints rather than direct statements specifying a date and scale of war. Ukraine repeatedly raised the issue because public concern was hurting the economy and the national currency, which began to fall. The speaker asked Americans to send a clear signal and urgently transfer weapons, but, in his words, no one provided anything. He also asked President Biden to impose sanctions on Russia in advance, preemptively, to stop the invasion, but Biden replied that sanctions would only be imposed in case of invasion, that is, post factum. The speaker considers this a mistake, though he does not presume to judge the president. At the end of the excerpt, it is mentioned that Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, and that in October 2021 the Director of National Intelligence (the excerpt cuts off, so the content of the message is unknown).
- Signals of a possible Russian invasion were cautious diplomatic hints, not direct statements with a date and nature of the war.
- The Ukrainian side repeatedly raised the threat issue, since public concerns affected the economy and the stability of the national currency, whose exchange rate had begun to fall.
- The speaker asked the US to send a clear signal and urgently transfer weapons, including any possible ones, but, in his words, no one transferred anything.
- The speaker asked President Biden to impose sanctions on Russia preemptively, before the invasion, to potentially deter Russia from advancing.
- Biden replied that sanctions would be imposed in case of invasion, that is, post factum, rather than preemptively.
- The speaker believes that refusing preemptive sanctions was a mistake, but does not presume to judge the president.
- Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
- In October 2021 the Director of National Intelligence is mentioned in the excerpt, but the message breaks off and its content is not given.
Sanctions and Intelligence
The interview covers pre-war intelligence, the start of the full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022, and the first weeks of the defense of Kyiv. US intelligence (the CIA, whose director flew to Moscow in November 2021) and European partners warned of preparations for an invasion. Satellite images showed about 100,000 Russian troops, and a declassification in December 2021 put the grouping at up to 175,000 people. Closer to February 2022, the US national security adviser publicly warned of a possible invasion at any moment and urged foreigners to leave Ukraine. The interviewee notes that partners did not believe the threat because they considered it a bluff aimed at pressuring Ukraine through the Minsk agreements, under which Ukraine would have to recognize Donbas and Crimea as not Ukrainian. According to him, the US did not impose sanctions or transfer weapons in advance, which increased doubts. He himself found it hard to believe in a full-scale invasion, since he thought that, with a known threat, partners would have taken preventive steps. During the invasion, according to the interviewee, Russian forces advanced from several directions with an emphasis on Kyiv. Before the invasion, the Ukrainian army was small, and its main forces were in the east, in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, facing the strongest Russian grouping. The number of Russian forces in Ukraine is estimated at about 700,000 across all directions. After the war began, mobilization and volunteers increased the army from 200,000 to 800,000. A Russian column 64 km long stretched along a single highway toward Kyiv; Russian forces seized the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and blockaded the city but could not take the capital. Ukrainian forces compelled the enemy to retreat, restoring control over the Kyiv and Chernihiv regions. The interviewee describes his actions: he stayed in Kyiv, held video calls with European leaders urging them to help Ukraine, and regularly went out to people to refute Russian claims that he had fled. Biden offered to help with evacuation, but the interviewee replied that he needed ammunition, not transport. His family was evacuated by security services. He notes that leaving Kyiv would have meant betrayal and that his presence was important for the army. Asked about fear, he did not answer directly but confirmed that it was his duty.
- CIA: the director flew to Moscow in November 2021 to warn Putin against invading.
- In December 2021, the US government declassified intelligence and assessments: up to 175,000 military personnel could attack.
- Satellite images from European media showed about 100,000 Russian troops, tanks, and field hospitals.
- In late January and early February, the US national security adviser publicly warned of an invasion at any moment and urged citizens to leave Ukraine.
- On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion from several directions, with an emphasis on Kyiv.
- Russian exercises in Belarus took place annually, but partners did not believe them and considered the threat a bluff.
- The goal of the pressure: to force Ukraine to implement the Minsk agreements by recognizing Donbas and Crimea as not Ukrainian.
- The US did not transfer weapons or impose sanctions in advance, which increased doubts.
- The main Ukrainian forces were in the east, in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions; before the invasion, the army numbered fewer than 200,000 people.
- Mobilization and volunteers increased the army from 200,000 to 800,000 people.
- The Russian presence was estimated at about 700,000 people.
- A column about 64 km long stretched along a single highway toward Kyiv.
- Russians seized the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and blockaded Kyiv but could not take it.
- Ukraine regained control over the Kyiv and Chernihiv regions, pushing Russian forces back.
- Biden offered help with evacuation; the interviewee asked for ammunition, not transport.
- The interviewee stayed in Kyiv and went out to people two or three times a day to refute rumors that he had fled.
- The interviewee's family was evacuated by security services; he spent part of the time in a bunker under the office.
- From video calls with European leaders, held from the bunker, the interviewee urged them to help Ukraine and not abandon it.
First days of the full-scale invasion and the defense of Kyiv
The chapter recounts the first days of the full-scale Russian invasion and the defense of Kyiv. The speaker describes intense crisis management: sleepless work, constant calls with leaders, logistics for weapons, and coordination with Poland (including Andrzej Duda), which only gave way to a sense of war about 20 days in. Priorities included communications, food, water, population support, and card payments, plus countering disinformation. Analysis of Russia's plan: a three-day campaign with parade uniforms and a planned victory parade on Khreshchatyk, underestimation of Ukrainian identity and resistance, and the need for roughly 300,000–400,000 troops to hold towns en route to Kyiv. The 2014 Crimea seizure with minimal resistance is contrasted with the 2022 defense. The battle for Hostomel airport is described as pivotal: Russian paratroopers seized it, Ukrainian forces (National Guard, special forces, air defense shooting down transport helicopters) retook it, and the runway was destroyed by Ukrainian shelling. Occupation of Bucha and surrounding towns involved looting, torture, sexual violence, killings, and mass graves of around 500 people, including children; the speaker says he ordered journalists to Bucha to document it. The speaker responds to Trump's claim that a wrong turn into mud delayed Russia's advance, rejecting it, and says Trump is right only that Crimea's loss enabled the war.
- In the first days of the war the speaker slept about 15 minutes a day; all work came down to communication with leaders and the military.
- The speaker talked with Poland at night, including with Andrzej Duda, and woke leaders in the middle of the night for weapons logistics.
- About 20 days after the start of the war, the understanding of the situation as a war turned into concrete steps.
- Crisis management priorities: unblocking Kyiv, retaking territories, communications, food, water, population support, and the operation of bank cards.
- Russians expected to take Kyiv in 3–10 days; their paratroopers had 3–10 days of rations and parade uniforms for a victory parade.
- Russian state media mistakenly published a prepared victory story on the third day.
- According to the speaker, Putin did not recognize Ukraine as a separate nation, which was one of the reasons for his miscalculation.
- To hold the towns on the way to Kyiv, the speaker estimates 300,000–400,000 people were needed, that is, twice the available forces.
- The seizure of Crimea in 2014 went almost without resistance; the speaker believes that without it there would have been no full-scale war.
- Battle for Hostomel airport: Russian paratroopers seized it, then Ukrainian forces (National Guard, special forces, air defense that shot down several transport helicopters) retook it; the Ukrainian side itself destroyed the runway.
- Hostomel, Moshchun, and small towns around Kyiv were sites of desperate fighting.
- In Bucha, according to the speaker, a mass grave of about 500 people was found, with torture, hands tied, and signs of violence.
- The speaker claims that Bucha and other cities saw looting, killings, sexual violence, and people buried in yards.
- The speaker says he invited journalists to Bucha to show the world what happened, and that the Russian version of staging is false.
- The speaker rejects Trump's words that a wrong turn of Russian tanks into mud delayed their advance, and agrees with him only regarding the role of losing Crimea.
Search for Compromise and Negotiations on the War
The speaker argues that a compromise requires a ceasefire and negotiations, though full reconciliation is impossible: people whose children were tortured cannot forgive, and the hatred will not disappear. He calls the negotiations a huge compromise and asks the American president to understand his side's position; the goal is to hold the current front lines and stop the fighting. The key turning point was Bucha, where he saw bodies scattered across the street, which changed his attitude: a desire for revenge and killing appeared that he had never felt before. He stresses that time and justice are necessary: a court and moral satisfaction are needed, the guilty must be punished, and at least a path to this must be shown. Without this, continued military or combat actions are possible, so peace cannot be simple. He says he dreams of the war ending, of returning to his family (wife Elena, children) and to a normal life, and that the war has irreversibly changed him, reassessing his values.
- A ceasefire and negotiations at the table are proposed as the way to reach a compromise, which is called a huge compromise.
- People whose children were tortured cannot forgive, and the hatred will not disappear; forgiveness cannot be forced.
- The speaker asked the U.S. president to understand the position and support holding the current front lines.
- Bucha is described as the hardest day: bodies were scattered across the street, which completely changed his attitude.
- After Bucha, a desire for revenge and killing arose, which he had never felt before.
- A just peace requires justice: the guilty must be punished, and a path to this must be shown, at least in the future.
- Without justice, continued military or combat actions are possible due to revenge.
- He dreams of ending the war, returning to his children and wife, and having at least some normal life.
- His wife Elena, in his words, notes that he has changed greatly and that his values have been reassessed.
- The war has irreversibly changed him: he notes a reassessment of values and a sense of loneliness at the front.
Personal life, family and the price of politics
The president describes missing his family even when they are close by, because he is used to fully immersing himself in work. He admits that the business he has run since age 18 pushed relationships with people into second place, and the war made him reconsider his priorities: for him, the people close to him come first and everything else is secondary. He says the children grew up over the last four years, that Ukrainian children's childhood has passed during the war, and that he believes in peace. He communicates with the children online when he has time. His wife Elena is described as his support, and their relationship is based on love, respect and mutual interest. His mother calls him almost every day, asks how he is feeling and how the children are, and asks when Putin will end the war. He then lists the occupied territories: Crimea, the Sea of Azov, which has become an internal sea, Mariupol, Berdyansk, and also Kerch, which, in his words, blocks Ukraine's access to the sea.
- The president says he misses his family even when close relatives are nearby, because of the habit of fully concentrating on work
- He has been involved in business since age 18 and admits that this pushed him away from his family and close relationships
- The war reshaped his priorities: business is secondary, and what matters most is the people around him
- The children grew up over the last four years; his daughter has become a grown young woman
- He says Ukraine's children grew up during the war and that their childhood has unfolded against the backdrop of the conflict
- He believes peace will prevail and puts the probability at 100%
- He communicates with the children online when he has time
- His wife Elena is described as his support and stability throughout all the difficult times; their relationship is based on love and respect
- His mother calls almost every day, and her first question is whether he answered the call
- His mother asks when Putin will end the war, and he replies that everything possible is being done
- Crimea is named as the first occupied territory
- According to the president, the Sea of Azov has become an internal sea, and Mariupol and Berdyansk have been captured
- Kerch is described as a city on the Black Sea that blocks Ukraine's access to the sea
Front Line Situation and Territorial Issues wh ere ...TBD
## Situation at the Front and Territorial Control According to the speaker, people in Oleshky, including children, are blocked without food or essentials, they are not being allowed through, and work on unblocking them is underway; 2,500 people remain. Ukraine has regained the major city of Kherson. The Dnipro divides the city: Ukrainian forces hold one bank while the enemy is on the other, so it shells Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Kherson and Zaporizhzhia are under Ukrainian control. The enemy has seized Crimea and the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. By the speaker's estimate, Ukraine controls about 18–19% of its territory; Kramatorsk remains under its control, while Yenakiieve and Makiivka in Donetsk region have been captured. The sides' maps diverge: the enemy tells its population one version, and Ukraine considers its own position correct. ## Missile and Drone Strikes The enemy constantly carries out missile and drone strikes on other regions of Ukraine. People were killed in Lutsk, Kyiv is being struck, and in Pryluky, which the speaker visited with the British Foreign Secretary, 23 people were killed. Zhytomyr is under constant shelling, and Odesa is also being shelled. Rivne and Lviv receive fewer strikes because these regions are far from the line of contact and from the border with the Russian Federation, so there are no massive strikes there. ## Enemy Goals and Territorial Demands According to the speaker, the enemy seeks to take Zaporizhzhia, as well as Kherson and Mykolaiv, but does not state this publicly. The enemy's demands boil down to the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the east, that is, the capture of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk and Druzhkivka, with further advance into Dnipropetrovsk region, including Pavlohrad and Dnipro. The speaker noted that his hometown Kryvyi Rih and Nikopol, an industrial, engineering and manufacturing hub and a foundation of the country's economy, are under threat. Surrendering these cities would create enormous risk, since the defenses here are well fortified, and further advance could lead to the capture of a large number of Ukrainian cities. ## Security Guarantees and Ceasefire No one is providing security guarantees. Ukraine openly states its readiness for guarantees, proposing NATO as an option, but, according to the speaker, Russia is sending signals against this. The largest compromise made so far, given the large number of dead, is readiness for a ceasefire, the speaker said. The enemy, however, demands further troop withdrawal, and in the speaker's view, upon withdrawal no security guarantees would remain, which would also be unjust. ## Risk of Nuclear Weapon Use The speaker noted that everyone fears a possible escalation involving nuclear weapons. By his estimate, as of today the enemy will not take this risk, because then it would have no allies left.
- Oleshky: people, including children, are blocked without food and essentials and are not being allowed through; work on unblocking is underway; 2,500 people remain
- Ukraine has regained the major city of Kherson; the Dnipro divides the city, with Ukrainian forces on one bank and the enemy on the other, so it shells Kherson and Zaporizhzhia
- Kherson and Zaporizhzhia are under Ukrainian control
- The enemy has seized Crimea and the Donetsk and Luhansk regions
- Ukraine controls approximately 18–19% of the country's territory
- Kramatorsk is under Ukrainian control; Yenakiieve and Makiivka (Donetsk region) have been captured by the enemy
- The sides' maps diverge; the enemy presents one version of events to its population
- The enemy carries out missile and drone strikes on other regions of Ukraine
- People were killed in Lutsk; strikes are being carried out on Kyiv
- In Pryluky, 23 people were killed; the speaker went there with the British Foreign Secretary
- Zhytomyr is under constant shelling; Odesa is also being shelled
- Rivne and Lviv receive fewer strikes: they are far from the line of contact and from the border with the Russian Federation
- Enemy goal: take Zaporizhzhia; Kherson and Mykolaiv are also targets, but the enemy does not state this publicly
- Enemy demands: withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the east, capture of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and advance into Dnipropetrovsk region (Pavlohrad, Dnipro)
- Kryvyi Rih is the speaker's hometown; Nikopol is an industrial, engineering and manufacturing hub and a foundation of the country's economy
- Surrendering the cities would create enormous risk, as the defenses here are well fortified
- No one is providing security guarantees; Ukraine is open to guarantees, including through NATO; Russia is sending signals against this
- The largest compromise made is readiness for a ceasefire; the enemy demands further troop withdrawal
- Upon troop withdrawal, security guarantees would disappear, which is also unjust
- Use of nuclear weapons is unlikely, because the enemy would have no allies left
Energy Crisis and Russia's Position in World Politics
The speaker considers the use of nuclear weapons unacceptably dangerous even for nuclear powers, including the US and China, because a weapon used once could be used again in another conflict, such as in the Middle East. He does not think Putin would risk using nuclear weapons, but stresses that he is dealing with a person and a system that hold power until the end of their lives, and that power will transfer only after his death, which he is absolutely certain of. He then discusses Trump's deal with Russia on diesel fuel amid a global energy crisis and Trump's request not to attack Russia's energy infrastructure. In the cited video address, Trump claims that Zelensky could have settled the war many times but does not want to, that the war should not have started, and that if the presidential election had not been rigged, he would have been president and there would have been no war. Trump also claims that Russia supplies most of the world's diesel, that Zelensky struck diesel despite a warning of a major shortage, and that he should hit oil refineries instead of diesel. The speaker rejects these claims: Russian diesel exports are negligible in volume and have zero impact on US prices, and the claim to the contrary is completely false. He explains that Ukraine strikes Russian energy in response to Russian strikes on Ukraine's power grid, which leave people without electricity, and that electricity is critical for Ukraine, whereas Russia earns money from diesel that it spends on weapons. He proposed an energy ceasefire to Trump, but Putin refuses it, and Trump blames Zelensky for the problem, explaining to Americans the rise in diesel prices, which is also untrue. The speaker considers this position unfair, since responsibility for Russian aggression is shifted onto Ukraine. In his view, the real root of the problem lies in the Middle East: the Strait of Hormuz is blocked, supply volumes there are fully cut off, and the Ukraine issue merely distracts attention from Iran.
- The speaker believes that using nuclear weapons is unacceptably dangerous even for nuclear powers, including the US and China.
- If nuclear weapons are used once, they may be used again, including in a conflict on another continent or theater of war, such as in the Middle East.
- The speaker does not believe Putin would risk using nuclear weapons, but stresses that he is within a system that keeps him in power for the rest of his days.
- According to the speaker, Putin will leave the Kremlin and hand over power only after his life ends, and he is absolutely certain of this.
- Trump concluded a deal with Russia for diesel fuel supplies amid a global energy crisis.
- Trump asked Ukraine not to attack Russia's energy infrastructure.
- Trump claims that Zelensky could have settled the war many times but does not want to, and that the war should not have started.
- Trump states that if the presidential election had not been rigged, he would have been president and there would have been no war.
- Trump claims that Russia supplies most of the world's diesel fuel and that strikes on diesel create a problem for farmers and ranchers in the US.
- Trump claims that Zelensky struck diesel despite a warning of a major shortage, and that Ukraine should hit oil refineries.
- Trump stated that Ukraine needs a new president.
- The speaker asserts that the volume of Russian diesel exports is negligible and has no impact on prices in the US.
- The speaker asserts that Ukraine strikes Russian energy in response to Russian strikes on Ukraine's power grid.
- According to the speaker, Ukraine lacks oil, gas, and diesel, and the greatest damage to it comes from the lack of electricity.
- Russia earns money from diesel fuel, which it spends on weapons.
- The speaker proposed to Trump an energy ceasefire.
- Putin refuses an energy ceasefire, and Trump cannot reach an agreement with him on this issue.
- Trump blames Zelensky for the problem and tells Americans that the rise in diesel prices is linked to him, which the speaker considers incorrect.
- The speaker asserts that Trump shifts responsibility for Russian aggression onto Ukraine, which is unfair.
- In the speaker's view, the root of the problem lies in the Middle East, where the Strait of Hormuz is blocked and all supply volumes are cut off.
- The speaker believes the Ukraine issue distracts attention from Iran and events in the Middle East.
Negotiations, Sanctions, and Domestic Political Pressure in the US
The President of Ukraine asks the US for air defense missiles, primarily Patriot, to protect the energy sector, and says he is ready for a ceasefire and will not attack the enemy. He says he asked for the missiles not for free, that Europe is financing the supplies, but that the US, reportedly, prioritizes the Middle East and refuses Ukraine. He calls it unfair that he is forbidden to respond to Russia's energy strikes and links this to the diesel deal between Trump and Putin. He claims that US diesel prices do not depend on the volume of Russian sales, that American companies export energy resources, and that the president cannot ban private-sector exports. He notes that about 76% of Ukrainians, according to recent polls, do not want elections now. Asked about a realistic path to ending the war, he answers that Trump could easily bring Putin to the negotiating table if he spoke about Putin in the same tone he uses about himself. He claims sanctions already lie on Trump's desk and were approved by Congress, which voted for tough measures, and that the president can apply them. He does not know the reasons for Trump's inaction and allows for economic deals or special relations with Russia. The interviewer suggests Trump is more concerned about US energy prices before the midterm elections than about Ukraine's fate. Concluding, the interviewee wishes America continued strength and peace and thanks it for its help to Ukraine.
- The President of Ukraine asks the US for air defense missiles, primarily Patriot, to protect the energy sector, and is ready for a ceasefire
- He asked for the missiles not for free; European countries are financing the supplies
- According to him, the US prioritizes the Middle East and refuses Ukraine
- He claims he is forbidden to respond to Russia's energy strikes and links this to the diesel deal between Trump and Putin
- He states that US diesel prices do not depend on the volume of Russian sales
- American companies export energy resources, and the president cannot ban private exports
- According to recent polls, about 76% of Ukrainians do not want elections now
- Trump can bring Putin to the negotiating table if he speaks about him in the same tone he uses about Zelensky
- Sanctions against Russia already lie on Trump's desk, and Congress, which voted for tough measures, approved them
- The reasons for Trump's inaction are unknown; economic deals or special relations with Russia are possible
- The interviewer suggests Trump is more concerned about US energy prices before the midterm elections than about Ukraine's fate
- The interviewee thanks the US for its help to Ukraine and wishes America strength and peace