~4m12:47
Saad Haddad

5 Mistakes Self-Taught Composers Make

Mar 15, 2026

Read: ~4m · You save: 9 min

5 Mistakes Self-Taught Composers Make

Five common mistakes quietly sabotage self-taught composers' careers. Learn how to define your sound, write more, skip competition traps, and get your music performed.

Five recurring mistakes can weaken the careers of self-taught composers. Each one reduces the music's reach and the composer's chances of receiving performances and commissions. Each also has a specific correction.

Mistake 1: Having No Defined Aesthetic

Many self-taught composers believe they must remain original at all times. In practice, this often produces a body of work with no consistent identity. One piece is serialist, the next imitates Bach, and the one after that is neo-Romantic.

Musicians deciding whether to commission a composer want to know what kind of music they will receive. A scattered body of work makes that difficult to judge. As a result, composers with inconsistent output receive fewer commissions than their talent might otherwise support.

The fix: Define an aesthetic menu. This is a set of styles the composer is willing to write in. It does not require a single fixed style. It requires that the styles be clear and identifiable to outside musicians.

Mistake 2: Confusing Study with Composing

Studying theory, counterpoint, and ear training is valuable. However, studying music does not develop composing skill. Composers who retreat into study when writing feels difficult may gain knowledge without gaining the ability to write. This gap often causes frustration and burnout.

The comparison to running illustrates the point. Reading about foot strike and cadence does not make a runner faster. Only running does.

The fix: Replace study time with writing time. Even short, imperfect sessions build skill. The recommended target for serious composers is 6 to 10 hours of composing per week. Regular writing produces visible progress, which sustains motivation.

Mistake 3: Writing for Competitions

Composers who write new pieces for a single competition face two risks. First, most concert music competitions target early-career professionals with an established voice and a record of performances. Beginners and self-taught composers are statistically unlikely to win. Second, competition pieces often follow strict guidelines for duration, instrumentation, difficulty, and theme. If the piece does not win, it has few other performance opportunities.

One student spent a full month writing a new piece for a choral competition that matched his style. He submitted it and waited three months. He was rejected. The piece had no other performance plan and remained unperformed.

The fix: Do not write new pieces specifically for competitions. Composers gain legitimacy through performances by real musicians, not through approval from a judging panel. Progress comes from having music played.

Mistake 4: Writing Dream Pieces Beyond Current Resources

Large projects can delay development when they exceed a composer's current technique and access. The author describes writing a symphony at age 14, after writing only a handful of pieces. The work took a long time to complete. It did not rely on technical skills the author could reuse, and no orchestra was available to perform it. The work was never performed.

A dream piece that does not match the composer's current situation can overwhelm the composer. A composer writing a 45-minute symphony without string-quartet experience or a conductor contact skips several stages of development.

The fix: Write for the musicians currently available. A flutist, a woodwind ensemble, or a pianist friend can all be starting points. Musicians a composer knows are far more likely to perform the music than strangers. A realistic piece that someone can play within a year leads to performances, and performances lead to commissions.

The student from the previous example applied this approach. He contacted musicians he already knew and asked to write pieces for them. He set a plan to write 10 new pieces in 2026, each with a confirmed performance. This exceeded the total number of performances he had received before.

Mistake 5: Working in Isolation

Many self-taught composers try to build a career alone. They lack a structured plan, and they often assume that composers in history worked entirely by themselves. Composing, however, is collaborative. Music exists to be performed by others.

Working with performers creates structure and accountability. A composer with six pieces committed to performers this year has clear deadlines and cannot easily drift. Workshopping pieces in progress also provides feedback that the composer cannot generate alone. Performers show which passages are effective, which music they connect with, and which they want to perform.

The fix: Bring other musicians into the process early and repeatedly. Composers who grow fastest involve performers from the start of a piece.

Conclusion

Each mistake reduces the composer's visibility, productivity, or access to performance. The corrections share a common approach: define a clear aesthetic, write regularly, prioritize performable music for available musicians, and collaborate with performers throughout the process.

Introduction

Self-taught composers often sabotage their careers through five recurring mistakes. Each mistake is explained with an analogy and a concrete fix.

  • The speaker says five recurring mistakes quietly sabotage self-taught composers' careers.
  • The mistakes affect music quality, confidence, and chances of getting performances and commissions.
  • Each mistake is broken down with an explanation of how to fix it.

Mistake 1: Having No Clear Aesthetic Identity

Writing music in many unrelated styles makes a composer hard to commission. Musicians want to know what they will get before they hire someone. The fix is to define a clear aesthetic menu of styles while still allowing variety within it.

  • Mistake 1: Feeling the need to always be original, which leads to constantly reinventing one's style.
  • Examples of shifting styles include serialist, Bach-inspired, and neo-romantic pieces written one after another.
  • Musicians want to know what type of music they will get before choosing a composer for a commission.
  • Composers with scattered bodies of work receive fewer commissions than they otherwise could.
  • The fix is to define an aesthetic menu: a clear set of styles one is known for, without being locked into a single style.
  • The speaker mentions a free guide for defining one's compositional voice, which is excluded as promotional material.

Mistake 2: Studying Instead of Writing

Excessive study can feel productive but replaces actual composing. Skill comes from writing reps, not reading. Composers should aim for 6 to 10 hours a week of actual composing time.

  • Mistake 2: Retreating into learning mode by reading theory, doing counterpoint exercises, and practicing ear training instead of writing.
  • Analogy: researching running technique without running does not make you a faster runner.
  • Studying music is not the same as writing music, and it creates frustration when composing again.
  • Fix: when tempted to open a theory book, write instead, even if the result is messy or only eight bars.
  • Skill comes from reps, not reading. Labeling a Neapolitan chord matters less than hours spent writing notes.
  • Target: 6 to 10 hours per week of actual composing time.

Mistake 3: Chasing Competitions

Writing new pieces for competitions is a poor strategy. Competition pieces are often tailored to narrow guidelines, and most competitions favor established professionals rather than beginners. Composers should focus on getting music performed.

  • Mistake 3: Writing brand new pieces specifically for competitions.
  • A student spent a full month writing a new piece for a choral competition that matched his style.
  • The student waited 3 months and was rejected, leaving the piece with nowhere to go because the competition was his only performance plan.
  • Competition pieces are often written to fit duration limits, instrumentation, difficulty level, and theme requirements, which narrows their future use.
  • The speaker calls this writing yourself into a corner and advises students never to write new pieces specifically for competitions.
  • Most concert music competitions target early-career professionals with a clear voice and track record of performances, so beginners rarely win.
  • Composers become real composers by writing notes on a page, not by winning validation from judging panels.
  • Real progress comes from having music played by real musicians.

Mistake 4: Chasing the Dream Piece

Dream projects that are far beyond a composer's current reality can stall growth. Composers should write for musicians they actually know and can realistically get performances from.

  • Mistake 4: The dream piece trap, which feels noble but can consume months or years.
  • At age 14, the speaker decided to write a first symphony titled Symphony number one, a full symphony.
  • The symphony was never performed. It took forever to write, lacked the required technique, produced no reusable skills, and had no orchestra available.
  • The speaker realized the piece was a stall rather than a step forward.
  • Example of an ungrounded dream: writing a 45-minute symphony without having written for four strings or knowing a conductor.
  • Fix: match the music to the musicians you have access to, such as writing for a flutist friend, a local wind ensemble, or a pianist friend.
  • Writing a real piece that someone can play within the next year leads to performances, which lead to commissions.
  • The student from the competition example reached out to musicians he knew, asked to write for them, and set up 10 new pieces in 2026, all guaranteed performances.

Mistake 5: Working Alone

Trying to build a composing career alone usually fails. Composing is collaborative by nature. Working with performers creates accountability and provides feedback that improves writing faster than books.

  • Mistake 5: Trying to build an entire composing career completely on one's own, described as the biggest root problem.
  • Analogy: a composing career is like building a house with many rooms, including musical voice, workflow, and performance and commission opportunities.
  • Composers who grab tools randomly without direction face frustration.
  • Many composers need a concrete plan and an experienced guide, much like a house needs builders and an architect.
  • Historical composers are often imagined as working alone, but composing is collaborative because music exists to be played by others.
  • Having performers expecting a piece creates accountability, and the speaker mentions having six pieces lined up this year with excited performers.
  • Workshopping pieces in progress with performers provides feedback on what feels great to play, what connects emotionally, and what performers are excited to perform.
  • The fastest-growing composers bring other people into the process early and often.